An Intersectional Analysis of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes
By Negin Ghavami, L. A. Peplau. 2013
479 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d13852d45e797e9e6adb8f0cc2ae797d7968d2b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- John F. Dovidio
- Ashleigh Shelby Rosette
- R. Livingston
- Anyi Ma
- C. Koval
- April H. Bailey
- Jaime L. Napier
- Andrea C. Vial
In Sociology and Political Science
- April H. Bailey
- Marianne LaFrance
- John F. Dovidio
- Ashleigh Shelby Rosette
- R. Livingston
- Anyi Ma
- C. Koval
- K. Deaux
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility (2020, unknown): “For Black, Indigenous, and other women of color, the intersection of stereotypes about both their race and gender exacerbates their exclusion (Cole, 2009; Ghavami & Peplau, 2013; King, 1988; Settles & Buchanan, 2014).”
- Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases (2020, methodology): “IBD and EIBD experiments use the same test set consisting of 98 attributes associated with 2 groups defined by gender (females, males), 3 groups defined by race (African American, Mexican American, European American), 6 intersectional groups defined by race and gender and random words taken from WEA”
- Why Does Workplace Gender Diversity Matter? Justice, Organizational Benefits, and Policy (2019, background): “…considered gender and racial stereotypes separately, intersectional approaches suggest that gender stereotype content varies by racial identity, and that in Western societies generic stereotypes of “women” and “men” most closely match those of White women and men (Ghavami & Peplau, 2013).”
- Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biases (2020, methodology): “80, p < 10−2), confirming the intersectional hypothesis [30].”
- Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties (2016, methodology): “In Ghavami and Peplau (2012) study, ratings of White women's intellect were conflicting, as they were rated with frequencies of 13 and 8 for ditzy (e.”
- Theory-Grounded Measurement of U.S. Social Stereotypes in English Language Models (2022, background): “social identities are multifaceted (Ghavami and Peplau, 2013).”
- Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism (2018, methodology): “Supporting the former possibility, androcentrism appears to emerge in diverse racial and ethnic groups, with the exception of the category Asians, which elicits an interactive effect (e.g., Ghavami & Peplau, 2012).”
- The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014 (2016, background): “At the same time, the work on intersectionality makes a strong case for the importance of considering the intersections of various categories, both in terms of self-defined identities and in terms of stereotypes (Cole, 2009; Ghavami & Peplau, 2012; Greenwood, 2012).”
- Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Models (2023, background): “Intersectionality refers to the notion that systems of oppression like sexism and racism are interrelated, and thus multifaceted social identities can be loci of compounding bias and unique harms (Collective, 1983; Ghavami and Peplau, 2013; Crenshaw, 2017).”
- Racialized Sexism/Sexualized Racism: A Multimethod Study of Intersectional Experiences of Discrimination for Asian American Women (2018, background): “In contrast to Ghavami and Peplau (2013), our results suggest that “submissive” can be specifically gendered in its experience.”
- Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research (2016, methodology): “…relatively few quantitative studies in psychology have applied an intersectionality framework (e.g., Bowleg et al., 2016; Else-Quest et al., 2013; Ghavami & Peplau, 2013; Seaton et al., 2010), social science in general and psychology researchers in particular need clear articulation about how to…”