Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research

By Nicole Else-Quest, Janet S. Hyde. 2016

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38e692c754c2ebbda85406cb045a25d1f5bbd178

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Invited Reflection (2016, background): “In a welcomed addition to this list, enter feminist psychologists Else-Quest and Hyde (2016) with a substantive examination of some key methodological and technical considerations for the discipline of psychology.”
What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants (2019, background): “Other scholars have suggested ways in which engaging with intersectionality could transform psychology (e.g., Bowleg & Bauer, 2016; Cole, 2009; Del Toro & Yoshikawa, 2016; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016a, 2016b; Marecek, 2016; Rosenthal, 2016; Warner, 2016; Warner, Settles, & Shields, 2016).”
Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017, unknown): “, Else-Quest et al., 2010; Zentner & Mitura, 2012). It is in the domain of subjective self-ratings that gender differences are larger in more equitable nations (Wood & Eagly, 2012). Such judgments about the self require participants to construct estimates about the self. Guimond and colleagues (2007”
Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility (2020, unknown): “…Moradi & Grzanka, 2017; Shields, 2008; Warner, Settles & Shields, 2018), apply rigorous methods to studying intersectionality (e.g., Bowleg, 2008; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016; Goff & Kahn, 2013; Warner, 2008), and appropriately apply intersectionality across a variety of activities and contexts,…”