Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation

By C. Mowbray, M. Holter, G. Teague, D. Bybee. 2003

922 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfbc6010ed689a2a032701405ad2852acaa00eba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

On the Fidelity of Implementing Embedded Formative Assessments and Its Relation to Student Learning (2008, background): “While adherence refers to the implementation of the structure of the treatment, quality describes the implementation’s fidelity to the process of the treatment ( Mowbray, Holter, Teague, & Bybee, 2003; Ruiz-Primo, 2005).”
Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the (2005, background): “Some of the changes at an implementation site will be undesirable and will be defined as program drift and a threat to fidelity (Adams, 1994; Mowbray et al., 2003; Yeaton & Sechrest, 1981).”
Fidelity Measurement in Consultation: Psychometric Issues and Preliminary Examination (2009, neutral): “Various analyses were performed to ex plore the psychometric qualities of the fidelity measures (Mowbray et al., 2003).”
A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge (2010, methodology): “…we looked at others’ operational definitions of FOI and saw that many suggested that implementation could be determined by identifying whether critical components of a program are present or not (Bond et al., 2000; Huntley, 2005; Mowbray et al., 2003; Sabelli & Dede, 2001; Wang et al., 1984).”
Using Indices of Fidelity to Intervention Core Components to Identify Program Active Ingredients (2015, background): “Despite the utility of knowing which intervention core components constitute active ingredients (Irwin & Supplee, 2012), there is surprisingly little empirical work examining fidelity to individual intervention core components and their relation to program outcomes (Collins et al., 2005; Mowbray et ”
Implementation Research (2016, methodology): “…agreement, assessment of intraclass correlations among raters, examination of the internal structure of the data through measures of internal consistency or confirmatory factor analysis, and test-retest reliability (Mowbray et al., 2003; Scheirer & Rezmovic, 1983; Schulte et al., 2009).”
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method (2009, background): “This knowledge helps to inform what to teach to new practitioners, how to transform or reorganise healthcare processes, and what to include in the assessment of practitioner performance (fidelity measures)–all key features of successful implementation [11,12].”
Moving From the Lab to the Field: The Role of Fidelity and Achieved Relative Intervention Strength (2009, background): “The notion of intervention fidelity has been captured under a broad array of labels, such as treatment integrity, adherence, compliance, dose, exposure, quality of delivery, and treatment differentiation (for reviews, see Dane & Schneider, 1998 ; Dusenbury, Brannigan, Falco, & Hansen, 2003 ; Mowb”
Advances in Treatment Integrity Research: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Enhancement of Treatment Integrity (2009, positive): “Both Mowbray et al. (2003) and Pere pletchikova and Kazdin (2005) have addressed the problem of validating treatment integrity measures.”
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Life Skills Interventions Ψ (2013, methodology): “A number of researchers have described the critical components of FOI (see Dane & Schneider, 1998; Mowbray et al., 2003 for details). One of the few LS program effectiveness studies to include an examination of FOI was conducted by O’Hearn and Gatz (2002). They investigated the issue of Leader Fidel”