A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge
By Jeanne Century, M. Rudnick, Cassie Freeman. 2010
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29c6a843590a15b92b3a8767aa875e3d3c189547
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Margaret Rintamaa
- Janis C. Carter
- Gerjo Kok
- Amy E. Cassata
- K. Hodge
- Maria E. Fernandez
- S. Danish
- Robert A. C. Ruiter
In Information Systems and Management
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Alison E. Baroody
- Margaret Rintamaa
- S. Rimm-Kaufman
- Charles Henderson
- Maura Borrego
- Janis C. Carter
- Michelle Ko
- Amy E. Cassata
Citations in the corpus
- Reading Intervention in Middle and High Schools: Implementation Fidelity, Teacher Efficacy, and Student Achievement (2013, background): “While these studies suggest that some adaptation is beneficial, at least the critical features of an intervention should be delivered as planned to constitute an acceptable level of implementation fidelity (Century et al., 2010; Dane & Schneider, 1998).”
- Using Indices of Fidelity to Intervention Core Components to Identify Program Active Ingredients (2015, background): “Century, Rudnick, and Freeman (2010) suggest measuring the critical components of instructional materials.”
- Developing a Conceptual Framework for Life Skills Interventions Ψ (2013, background): “FOI is defined by Century, Rudnick, and Freeman (2010) as “the extent to which the critical components of an intended program are present when that program is enacted” (p. 202); that is, the extent to which delivery of an intervention adheres to the protocol or program model originally developed…”
- Implementation Research (2016, background): “This perspective acknowledges that many innovations and business-as-usual educational practices may have some degree of component overlap (Century et al., 2010; Michie, Fixsen, Grimshaw, & Eccles, 2009; Nelson, Cordray, Hulleman, Darrow, & Sommer, 2012), in particular, with components representing…”
- Efficacy of the Responsive Classroom Approach (2014, background): “Century (2010) defines fidelity of implementation as ‘‘the extent to which the critical components of an intended program are present when that program is enacted’’ (p. 202).”
- Fidelity of Implementation of Research‐Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses (2013, methodology): “Century et al. (2010) called these the critical components, defined as the “essential features that must be measured to determine whether a program is present or not” (p. 201).”
- Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies (2019, background): “Implementation evaluation and process evaluation are terms that are often used interchangeably and essentially assess the extent to which implementation strategies fit well within the context, are delivered with fidelity and are addressing identified needs (50, 51).”