The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda
By Jolyn Gelens, Nicky Dries, Joeri Hofmans, Roland Pepermans. 2013
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ceb21174d21a5a374701fa2a1c2e73e4a9a5c434
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- M. Morley
- Roberto Luna Arocas
- Nicky Dries
- Maria Christina Meyers
- Roland Pepermans
- Joeri Hofmans
- Jolyn Gelens
- G. D. Boeck
Citations in the corpus
- Talent management, talent mindset competency and job performance: the mediating role of job satisfaction (2015, background): “Recently a micro-level perspective on TM has been reflected by some authors (Björkman et al., 2013; Gelens et al., 2013; Gelens et al., 2014).”
- Employee reactions to talent management: Assumptions versus evidence (2018, background): “InclusiveTM emerged as a response to the critique that exclusive TM evokes negative reactions in non‐talented employees, which could potentially lead to negative “net effects” of TM at the group level (Gelens et al., 2013; Swailes, 2013).”
- Talent management and organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification (2014, background): “For this reason, several researchers (Becker et al., 2009; Gelens et al., 2013) have suggested that studying the effects of talent management at the micro level is necessary.”