Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning
By Á. F. Agudo-Peregrina, Santiago Iglesías-Pradas, Miguel Ángel Conde González, Á. Hernández-García. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014
405 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ceab0507511cc6c0557360e6eb66b3bdcc679ff9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Chris J. Snijders
- Dirk T. Tempelaar
- Bas Giesbers
- Uwe Matzat
- Bart Rienties
- Ad Kleingeld
- Rianne Conijn
In Education
- Chris J. Snijders
- Dirk T. Tempelaar
- Bas Giesbers
- Uwe Matzat
- Bart Rienties
- Ad Kleingeld
- Rianne Conijn
Citations in the corpus
- In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context (2015, methodology): “Recent studies in learning analytics (Agudo-Peregrina et al., 2014; Author A, 2013a; Macfadyen & Dawson, 2010; Wolff et al., 2013) seem to indicate that adding LMS user behaviour to these models can substantially improve the explained variance of academic performance.”
- Predicting Student Performance from LMS Data: A Comparison of 17 Blended Courses Using Moodle LMS (2017, methodology): “Total number of clicks [13], [17], [34], [37], [42] 4,989 605 630 Number of online sessions [10], [18], [29], [31], [32], [33], [35], [36], [39], [43], [44] 4,989 30.”