Being different: correlates of the experience of teasing and bullying at age 11
By H. Sweeting, P. West. 2001
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cddfdca84f21023bb11380db12713c75010a1f01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Sara Konrath
- Brad J. Bushman
- Olivier Luminet
- Olivier Corneille
- Dorothy Espelage
- E. Avramidis
- Craig A. Anderson
- Tobias Greitemeyer
In Social Psychology
- Chad A. Rose
- Dorothy Espelage
- Justin W. Patchin
- Sameer Hinduja
- Ann Frisén
- Hye-won Hwang
- C. P. McCluskey
- Byongook Moon
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sameer Hinduja
- Justin W. Patchin
- Hye-won Hwang
- C. P. McCluskey
- Byongook Moon
- M. Morash
- Sara Konrath
- Chad A. Rose
Citations in the corpus
- Self-concept, social position and social participation of pupils with SEN in mainstream primary schools (2013, background): “Factors that enhance their chances of being bullied include particular characteristics such as clumsiness, dyslexia and having a disability such as a sight, hearing or speech problem that may be used as a pretext for bullying (Sweeting and West 2001 ); behavioural problems causing them to act in an”
- A Comprehensive Test of General Strain Theory (2009, background): “Perhaps youth who become victims of school bullying are more likely to be isolated, depressed, nonassertive, and physically weak or disabled (Besag 1989; Olweus 1994, 1997; Sweeting and West 2001).”
- Teasing and Bullying Experiences of Middle School Students (2004, background): “Analysis of data from focus groups conducted with middle school students confirmed previous findings that differences in appearance, behavior, and ethnic, racial, or cultural background are risks for chronic teasing and bullying (Sweeting & West, 2001).”
- Bullying Perpetration and Victimization in Special Education: A Review of the Literature (2011, background): “Some studies documented 20% more students with language impairments reported being victimized compared to their general education peers (Davis, Howell, & Cooke, 2002; Knox & Conti-Ramsden, 2003; Sweeting & West, 2001).”
- Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization (2008, background): “Cyberbullying 147 (Graham and Juvonen 2002; Nansel et al. 2001; Seals and Young 2003; Siann, Callahan, Glissov, Lockhart, and Rawson 1994; Sweeting and West 2001).”
- Bullying in Adolescents Who Stutter: Communicative Competence and Self-Esteem (2004, unknown): “…spina bifida, hearing/visual impairments, emotional problems, severe intellectual disabilities, hyperactivity, or cleft palate have an increased risk of victimization (Bond, Carlin, Thomas, Rubin, & Patton, 2001; Johnson et al., 2002; Sheard, Clegg, Standen, & Cromby, 2001; Sweeting & West, 2001).”
- The Relationship Between Narcissistic Exploitativeness, Dispositional Empathy, and Emotion Recognition Abilities (2014, methodology): “They saw 10 facial expressions (anger, contempt, disgust, embarrassment, fear, happiness, pride, sadness, shame, and surprise) posed by two individuals (White man, White woman)—20 photos in all (presented randomly), from the University of California, Davis, Set of Emotion Expressions (Tracy et al. 2”
- 13‐year‐olds’ perception of bullying: definitions, reasons for victimisation and experience of adults’ response (2008, result): “This was due to few participants reporting the most frequent category of bullying, and also in line with literature in this area (eg, Sweeting and West 2001 ).”