Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation

By Yolande E. Chan, Rajiv Sabherwal, Jason Bennett Thatcher. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2006

582 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy (2007, methodology): “[ 14] or Sabherwal and Chan [63] - show that cost-driven, operationally excellent”
Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications (2010, methodology): “Uncertainty within the external environment increases the organization’s need for information processing and therefore increases the level of strategic importance of the organization’s information systems (Chan et al. 2006; Daft and Lengel 1986; Galbraith 1977).”
Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network (2009, background): “…and Mendelow (1989), Luftman and Brier (1999), Chan (2002) Sabherwal and Kirs (1994), Luftman et al. (1999), Hussin et al. (2002), Chan et al. (2006) Shared CIO-TMT domain knowledge Shared domain knowledge (CIO business knowledge; TMT IS knowledge) Lederer and Mendelow (1989),…”
IT alignment: what have we learned? (2007, background): “Similarly, Chan et al .”
Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination (2011, background): “1994), its assimilation of IT (Armstrong and Sambamurthy 1999), its level of IT–business alignment (Reich and Benbasat 2000), and its more focused and strategic use of IT (Chan et al. 2006).”