Deliberative Monetary Valuation and the Evidence for a New Value Theory

By C. Spash. 2008

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety Research

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values (2012, background): “…expression of value and those who assert the necessity of multi-metric approaches (Chee, 2004; EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board), 2009; Fischhoff, 1991; Gatto and De Leo, 2000; Norton and Noonan, 2007; O'Neill et al., 2007; Satterfield and Kalof, 2005; Spash, 2008b).”
The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “So the potential for interaction with and integration of aspects of American Pragmatism by social ecological economists remains an open question.”
Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions (2016, background): “…et al., 2014; Szabó, 2011; Urama and Hodge, 2006), as a means to bring in questions of fairness, justice and participation (O’Neill et al., 2008; Spash, 2008; Zografos and Howarth, 2010), and as an answer to theoretical critiques of economic appraisal that are based on assumptions of…”
Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “19 Some argue that such issues require alternatives to the individual centred approach of economics, favouring instead group approaches to assessment (Wilson and Howard, 2002; Spash, 2008).”
What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “…goods, such as biodiversity and ecosystem services) are pre-formed, indicating that they need to be constructed through some kind of transformative process of deliberation and learning (Christie et al., 2012; Kenter et al., 2011, 2014; Parks and Gowdy, 2013; Schlapfer, 2009; Spash, 2007, 2008).”
The Deliberative Value Formation model (2016, unknown): “…theory that could underpin deliberative valuation (e.g. Wilson and Howarth, 2002; Niemeyer, 2004; O’Neill, 2007; O’Neill, Holland and Light, 2008; Spash, 2007; 2008; Lo and Spash, 2012; Lo, 2013; Kenter et al., 2015; Orchard-Webb et al., 2016), there is only limited conceptual work on how…”
The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes (2010, background): “…concerns and market strategies can modify the way humans perceive and relate to nature in a way that in the long run may be counterproductive for conservation purposes (Rees, 1998; Martínez-Alier, 2002; Robertson, 2004; McCauley, 2006; Soma, 2006; Spash, 2008a; Kosoy and Corbera, this issue).”
The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands (2011, background): “However, values are not pre-formed but ‘constructed’ through deliberation, and conventional methodological individualism fails both to capture collective values and to make use of dialogue in order to encourage reflection of what a persons’ values truly are (Spash, 2008b).”
Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe (2010, background): “…in the valuation exercises to emphasize the relevance of preference construction and learning among the counterparts in the decision making process (Kenyon and Hanley, 2004; Spash, 2007; Álvarez-Farizo et al., 2007; Dolan et al., 2007; Stagl, 2007a;Spash, 2008; Álvarez-Farizo et al., 2009).”
Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy (2013, methodology): “…DMV follows on from this tradition by giving credence to legitimacy issues, civic engagement and social learning (Brown et al., 1995; Jacobs, 1997; Sagoff, 1998; Ward, 1999; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Wilson and Howarth, 2002; James and Blamey, 2005; Howarth and Wilson, 2006; Spash, 2007, 2008a).”
An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, background): “These researchers advocate a type of deliberative monetary valuation (DMV) that incorporates deliberative democracy into valuation (Dryzek, 2000; Spash, 2008).”
Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool (2012, background): “DMV articulates concerns additional to economic efficiency, such as fairness of distribution, but there is currently inconclusive evidence if this constitutes a distinct concept of value (Spash, 2008).”
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “…to a choice so that people know what they want is problematic in ecosystem service valuation because people rarely have ordered set of preferences for unfamiliar objects such as biodiversity (Gregory 2000) or regulating services like pollination or carbon sequestration (Vatn 2005; Spash 2008).”