Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe

By E. Garmendia, Sigrid Stagl. 2010

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review (2015, background): “Others discuss how problems with stakeholder representation or participatory process design mean processes fail to achieve their goals or exacerbate conflict (e.g. Gerrits and Edelenbos 2004; Garmendia and Stagl 2010).”
Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services (2016, background): “…the use of deliberation, and the application of social-ecological systems approaches become particularly pertinent to valuation of ecosystem services when realising that the inherent uncertainty of complex systems implies gives rise to multiple legitimate understandings (Garmendia and Stagl, 2010).”
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “…in which participants can learn about the consequences of alternative courses of action and reflect and revise their preferences through interaction with other people (Bana e Costa and Oliveira 2002; French et al. 2009; Keune and Dendoncker 2014; Garmendia and Stagl 2010; Kenter et al. 2015).”
How should barriers to alternative fuels and vehicles be classified and potential policies to promote innovative technologies be evaluated (2012, methodology): “More inclusive or participatory methods could be used to modify the criteria as part of future work and increase the transparency and robustness of the methodology (Kowalski et al., 2009; Garmendia and Stagl, 2010).”