The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes

By E. Gómez‐Baggethun, R.W.J. de Groot, P. Lomas, C. Montes. 2010

1,557 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4eaa1c69d6edad487ca0d5e4d5de52bd06e6b0e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review (2013, background): “This ambiguity led us to turn to the best established ecosystem service classifications, namely the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment – MA [25], The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – TEEB [26], the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services – CICES [27] and Beaumont et al. [31]”
Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework (2014, background): “The application of market-based incentive (MBI) mechanisms to deal with the challenges of landscape and environmental protection, climate mitigation, wetland restoration and biodiversity conservation is growing (Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010; Muradian and Rival, 2012; Pirard, 2012).”
Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach (2012, background): “The concept of ESS, coined in the 1980s in thewritings of Ehrlich and Ehrlich (1981) and Ehrlich and Mooney (1983), was designed as a way of demonstrating how biodiversity loss affects ecosystem functions and ultimately humanwell-being (Gomez-Baggethun et al., 2010).”
Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico (2011, background): “Some authors suggest that PES could attract political support for conservation, but could also result in a commodification of a growing number of environmental services (Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010; Kosoy and Corbera, 2010; Ledant, 2008).”
Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment (2013, background): “Recent trends in ecological economics integration, when considering natural resources management, were extended to ES advancing market-based mechanism, such as Markets for ES and the Payments for ES schemes (Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010).”
Blue carbon: : Knowledge gaps, critical issues, and novel approaches (2014, background): “wetlandmitigation banking, for instance – and PES –watershed protection or carbon sequestration– in thatMES aremore likely to have a commercial (for-profit) aspect (Corbera et al., 2009; Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010).”
Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, methodology): “The historical development of the ES concept and its incorporation into markets and payment schemes was depicted by Gomez-Baggethun et al. (2010).”
Ecosystem services approach for community-based ecotourism: towards an equitable and sustainable blue economy (2020, background): “It has also helped inform decisions on conservation and enterprise development attributing explicit economic value to natural resources (Assessment, 2005; Robert Costanza et al., 1997; Robert Costanza et al., 2014; G omez-Baggethun et al., 2010).”