The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands

By J. Kenter, T. Hyde, Michael Christie, I. Fazey. 2011

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be2caf8f7e01548c1178945f3e76cdf602e92e97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services : integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling (2016, methodology): “…individuals' or groups' preferences and contextual values are not pre-formed, but need to be generated through some kind of transformative process of deliberation and learning (Christie et al., 2012; Irvine et al., 2016; Kenter et al., 2011; Parks and Gowdy, 2013; Schlapfer, 2009; Spash, 2008).”
Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units (2012, background): “Similarly, WTP statements, if not properly put in the context of the socioeconomic conditions of the population of beneficiaries, may understate the true value of ecosystem services for poor and vulnerable communities due to inability to pay (Kenter et al., 2011).”
Twenty thousand sterling under the sea : Estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity (2014, background): “Participants are able to learn during an 529 experiment (Christie et al., 2006) and to tell us about their newly developed preferences based on 530 deeper held moral values (Kenter et al., 2011).”
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “To counter this ‘consumer bias’, some studies have elicited social rather than individual WTP, posing the question in the form of “What are we as a society willing to pay, or which choices do we make” (Kenter et al. 2011).”
Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services (2016, methodology): “At the same time, as a result of previous participatory research (Davies et al., 2014; Fazey et al., 2011; Kenter et al., 2011) and activities of a local bridging organisation, the Kahua Association (KA), local people had started to develop increasing interest in forest conservation projects.”
Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services (2016, methodology): “The two studies that have used fair price value indicators to date, Kenter et al. (2011) and Szabó (2011), have not provided much discussion of how fair prices might be interpreted on the basis of their empircal results, or investiage how they might contrast with individual WTP; these questions…”
The Deliberative Value Formation model (2016, unknown): “Transcendental values are often implicit and thus may require explicit prompts and deliberation to bring them out (Sagoff, 1998; Niemeyer 2004; Bardi and Goodwin, 2011; Kenter et al., 2011).”
A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration (2016, background): “Working together with multiple stakeholders in open dialogue t workshops can increase knowledge of a complex system signifiantly (Kenter et al., 2011).”
An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, methodology): “While this is obviously desirable, a challenging „side effect‟ of learning can be that certain values become increasingly lexicographic (Kenter et al., 2011).”
What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “, provisioning) services and benefitsmight be valued; a social learning process may be required to bring out more subtle shared senses of values with stronger moral and aesthetic components (Kenter et al., 2011; Reed et al., 2013).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “Kenter et al. (2011) have shown in a practical Frontiers in Environmental Science | www.frontiersin.org 24 June 2016 | Volume 4 | Article 41 FIGURE 11 | Shared and social values framework: the five dimensions and seven main types of shared and social values.”