An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies
By Michael Christie, I. Fazey, R. Cooper, T. Hyde, J. Kenter. 2012
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/820e8d7b541291e121099dd39977f1946208e647
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions (2016, background): “Although a number of studies have emphasized that the idea of monetary and non-monetary valuation processes is limiting our understanding of ecosystem services (Christie et al., 2012), it can help to internalize so-called externalities such as impacts and side effects so that they can be accounted i”
- Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research (2018, background): “While there has been extensive research on identifying values [94] and identifying the normative challenges in transformational change processes [31], researchers across the social and natural sciences rarely acknowledge the values and ethics that shape their own research [95].”
- The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services : integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling (2016, background): “…individuals' or groups' preferences and contextual values are not pre-formed, but need to be generated through some kind of transformative process of deliberation and learning (Christie et al., 2012; Irvine et al., 2016; Kenter et al., 2011; Parks and Gowdy, 2013; Schlapfer, 2009; Spash, 2008).”
- Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services (2016, background): “People may have difficulty understanding the complexity of environmental benefits and may need time to think and deliberate (Alvarez Farizo et al., 2007; Christie et al., 2012; Lienhoop and MacMillan, 2007a; Nunes and van den Bergh, 2001).”
- Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods (2015, background): “171 Equally as important, the payment vehicle needs to be an appropriate and reliable measure of 172 wealth (Bennet and Birol, 2010; Christie et al., 2012).”
- What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “…goods, such as biodiversity and ecosystem services) are pre-formed, indicating that they need to be constructed through some kind of transformative process of deliberation and learning (Christie et al., 2012; Kenter et al., 2011, 2014; Parks and Gowdy, 2013; Schlapfer, 2009; Spash, 2007, 2008).”
- How to value biodiversity in environmental management (2015, background): “In other ords, assessing the socio-cultural value of biodiversity, which in his case provides society with benefits such as mental well-being nd ethical, spiritual, and cultural values, is necessary (Posey, 1999; hristie et al., 2012).”
- Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity (2015, result): “This finding is in accordance with a more general pattern identified by Christie et al. (2012), who found out that most valuation studies are being conducted in developed countries, whereas ecologically more valuable areas in the developing world 6 A full list of the studies included in this review…”