Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services
By H. Saarikoski, J. Mustajoki, David N. Barton, D. Geneletti, J. Langemeyer, E. Gómez‐Baggethun, Mika Marttunen, P. Antunes, H. Keune, Rui Santos. 2016
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/675268b1c51d44996c987802cb5d9c2332cba217
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- B. Martín‐López
- H. Wittmer
- Daniel M. Cáceres
- David N. Barton
- C. Liquete
- P. May
- Martin F. Quaas
In Global and Planetary Change
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- B. Martín‐López
- Nicolas Dendoncker
- H. Wittmer
- Daniel M. Cáceres
- P. May
- Martin F. Quaas
- S. Jacobs
Citations in the corpus
- A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions (2016, background): “, 2016) can also be essential to evaluate studies and determine effectiveness (Saarikoski et al., 2016).”
- Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach (2017, background): “as associated uncertainty), of opinions (also among experts), of actors’ perspectives (and stakes), and of decision making criteria [34 ,35,36].”