Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy

By Alex Y. Lo, C. Spash. 2013

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5378c7c3900a4a7e8f30bfa9a7f440ba108f3407

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

The Deliberative Value Formation model (2016, unknown): “Those calling for pluralistic approaches to valuation (e.g. Foster, 1997; Sagoff, 1998; Holland, 2002; O’Neill, 2007; Howarth and Anderson, 2007; O’Neill, Holland and Light, 2008; Spash, 2008; Lo and Spash, 2012; Baveye, Baveye and Gowdy, 2013; Parks and Gowdy, 2013; Lo, 2013; Kenter et al., 2015) h”
The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services : integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling (2016, background): “However, the transcendental values intervention also lead to more explicit ‘moralisation’ (Lo and Spash, 2012), bringing out a stronger normative element in relation to how sites ought to be managed.”
What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “…of the deliberative process determines the types of values that arise within the process, e.g., whether transcendental and other-regarding values aremade explicit, which determines towhat degree the outcomes of the process are ‘moralised’ and ‘democratised’ (c.f. Lo and Spash, 2012).”
The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “So the potential for interaction with and integration of aspects of American Pragmatism by social ecological economists remains an open question.”
Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions (2016, background): “The democratic content in DDMV is secured by a combination of procedural fairness at each stage of the process; creating inclusive platforms for expression of transcendental and contextual values by ‘free and equal citizens’; and creating the conditions for communicative rationality via social inter”
Integrating deliberative monetary valuation, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services (2016, background): “deliberation focused on helping participants state more informed preferences, and ‘moralisation’ (Lo and Spash, 2012).”
Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: Implications for Contingent Valuation Method (2015, background): “…extent that such correlation exists, WTP estimates should be seen as an indication of political, social, or moral sentiments, rather than economic preferences, and therefore fail to satisfy the economic assumptions underlying the CVM and represent economic values (Lo and Spash, 2013; Spash, 2007).”
An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, background): “…time to think about the environmental good before undertaking the valuation exercise and thus address potential issues associated with the complexity and unfamiliarity of biodiversity (Macmillan et al., 2002) or embedding political economy concepts into valuation (Lo and Spash, 2012; Spash, 2007b).”