The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆
By L. R. Goldberg, John A. Johnson, H. Eber, R. Hogan, M. Ashton, C. Robert Cloninger, Harrison G. Gough. 2006
3,386 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca24ef19e69f4ff1deca06ac8114a742c3fac223
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Fred Luthans
- James Avey
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Robert E. McGrath
- Arnold B. Bakker
- P. D. Harms
- Steven M. Norman
- Paul J Silvia
In Clinical Psychology
- Paul J Silvia
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- M. Ashton
- Kibeom Lee
- James C. Kaufman
- P. D. Harms
- James Avey
- Fred Luthans
Citations in the corpus
- Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust (2008, background): “The IPIP is an online collaboratory of over 2,400 personality items from over 200 scales (Goldberg et al., 2006).”
- The role of weekly high‐activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model (2014, methodology): “This was measured with four items of the International Personality Item Pool (Donnellan, Oswald, Baird, & Lucas, 2006; Goldberg et al., 2006).”
- Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity (2008, methodology): “The third scale was the 20-item measure of Openness to Experience from the International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg et al., 2006).”
- Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths (2015, methodology): “The PPQ was administered as part of the development of the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP; Goldberg et al., 2006), a large set of items in the public domain intended to offer broad coverage of personality variables.”
- Identifying and Assessing Creativity as a Component of Giftedness (2012, neutral): “The International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg et al., 2006) is a free alternative.”
- Personality in sport: a comprehensive review (2013, background): “, 2008), the international personality item pool (Goldberg et al., 2006) and the 10-item personality inventory (Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003).”
- Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between the Big Five and Academic Success at University (2007, neutral): “…Personality Questionnaire; Eysenck, & Eysenck, 1975), 16PF (Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire; e.g., Cattell, Eber, & Tatsuoka, 1970), CPI (California Psychological Inventory; Gough, 1975), IPIP (International Personality Item Pool; Goldberg et al., 2006), and NEO-FFI (Costa & McCrae, 1991).”
- Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede's cultural dimensions (2011, background): “The consensus within the research community led to the 1996 online establishment of the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) in the public domain to promote ongoing research in the FFM (Goldberg et al., 2006).”
- The Big Five Personality Traits and Attitudes towards Immigrants (2014, methodology): “The survey included 50 items from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) (Goldberg et al. 2006) as well as measures of respondents’ socioeconomic status, demographics and ideology.”
- Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach (2013, methodology): “We created age and genderadjusted word clouds for each personality factor based on around 72 thousand participants with at least 1,000 words across their Facebook status updates, who took a Big Five questionnaire [91].”
- Neuroticism as a Risk Factor for Behavioral Dysregulation: A Mindfulness-Mediation Perspective (2010, methodology): “The scale correlates strongly with the NEO-PI neuroticism scale (Costa & McCrae, 1992) and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity (Goldberg et al., 2006).”
- Pornography and Sexist Attitudes Among Heterosexuals (2013, background): “The validity and reliability of the IPIP scales have been documented in numerous cross-cultural and international published studies including studies using a Danish subject sample (Goldberg et al., 2006).”