Corporate social responsibility: the 3C‐SR model

By J. Meehan, Karon Meehan, Adam Richards. 2006

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the Firm (2018, methodology): “…consistency, the main argument is that this entails the behavioral element of social resources over time and across all areas of an organization’s operation, and that the negative version of this corresponds to the scenario that CSR fails when companies do not walk their talk (Meehan et al. 2006).”
‘How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships’ (2018, methodology): “1971), the Ackerman’s Model (Ackerman and Bauer 1976), the Stakeholder Model (Freeman 1984), the Pyramid Model of CSR (Carroll 1991), the Three-Domain Model of CSR (Schwartz and Carroll 2003), and the 3C-SR Model (Meehan et al. 2006).”
Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. (2011, background): “In general, regarding implementation issues, the literature on organizational responsibility places more emphasis on the “oughts” than on the “hows” (Meehan et al., 2006).”