Well-being at work: a cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction

By A. Sousa-Poza, Andres Sousa-Poza. 2000

803 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c99ea5c61523c1b619c0764f13588278eb12258c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. (2007, background): “…coworkers is positively associated with attitudinal outcomes, such as increased job satisfaction, as well as behavioral and physiological outcomes, such as enhanced effectiveness and reduced stress (e.g., Gerstner & Day, 1997; Sousa-Poza & Sousa-Poza, 2000; Viswesvaran, Sanchez, & Fisher, 1999).”
Not all that it might seem: why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor summary measure of job quality (2012, background): “…often reflecting the availability of data in nationally representative surveys, and they have portrayed job satisfaction as an overall measure of ‘well-being at work’ (Sousa-Poza and Sousa-Poza, 2000; Green, 2006) or the ‘utility’ provided by work (Clark and Oswald, 1996; Frey and Stutzer, 2002).”
Relative pay and job satisfaction: some new evidence (2003, background): “Several studies have consequently attempted to identify and measure the determinants of job satisfaction (Clark and Oswald 1996; Hamermesh 1977, 2001; Borjas 1979; Sousa-Poza and Sousa-Poza 2000; Grund and Sliwka 2001).”
Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants (2011, background): “Tang and Talpade (1999) focused on differences between men and women with respect to their satisfaction with pay.”
Work-related factors that impact social work practitioners’ subjective well-being: Well-being in the workplace (2011, background): “Social capital in the workplace has a clear correlation with worker’s well-being in general (Helliwell & Huang, 2005; Lee & Ashforth, 1996; Pugliesi, 1999; Sousa-Poza & Sousa-Poza, 2000).”
What makes work meaningful and why economists should care about it (2020, background): “In economics, the most common subjective well-being measure in the work domain is job satisfaction (Clark, 2001, 2005, 2011, 2015; Sousa-Poza and Sousa-Poza, 2000; Wanous et al., 1997).2 Job satisfaction is a reflective assessment of one’s overall working environment that also incorporates…”
The structural relationship between TQM, employee satisfaction and hotel performance (2017, background): “The most important are wage structure, working conditions, work group, the nature of the work and the quality of supervision and salary (Sousa-Poza and Sousa-Poza, 2000; Jun et al., 2006; Rogelberg et al., 2010).”