“We must conclude that…”:A diachronic study of academic engagement

By Ken Hyland, Feng Kevin Jiang. 2016

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8b7e6749d68e7e02c5c06e324426f0cedec717f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Jim McKinley
4. Shih-Chieh Chien
5. R. Ruegg
6. Raffaella Negretti
7. Bethany Gray
8. Shulin Yu

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Douglas Biber

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Raffaella Negretti
4. Douglas Biber
5. A. Molino
6. Jim McKinley
7. Shih-Chieh Chien
8. Paul Thompson

Citations in the corpus

• “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018, background): “Variations in the ways writers use metadiscourse have not only been found in research articles (e.g. Jiang & Hyland, 2016; 7 Cao & Hu, 2014), but also in undergraduate essays (Noble, 2010), post graduate dissertations (Charles, 2006), academic book reviews (Tse & Hyland, 2006), and university…”