The Performance Implications of Participating in an Acquisition Wave: Early Mover Advantages, Bandwagon Effects, and The Moderating Influence of Industry Characteristics and Acquirer Tactics

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? (2016, unknown): “If a number of receivers interpret signals in a specific way, this might lead to imitation by others (McNamara et al. 2008; Connelly et al. 2011).”
POLITICAL CAPABILITIES, POLICY RISK, AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT STRATEGY: EVIDENCE FROM THE GLOBAL ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION INDUSTRY † (2010, background): “Finally, we included the total number of entries by all firms into a given host country in the prior year to account for possible ‘bandwagon effects’ (McNamara, Haleblian, and Dykes, 2008).”
Curvilinear relationship between cultural distance and equity participation: An empirical analysis of cross-border acquisitions (2011, methodology): “The R-square values range from 0.2917 to 0.2919 and are considered satisfactory and consistent with those reported in research on similar topics using similar databases (e.g., Lee et al., 2008; McNamara et al., 2008).”
When do Dynamic Capabilities Lead to Competitive Advantage? The Importance of Strategic Fit (2018, unknown): “Munificence is often reflected in expanding demand, but it may more broadly capture the extent to which firms in an industry have access to tangible and intangible resources needed to upgrade capabilities, experiment, and grow their enterprises (Dess and Beard, 1984; McNamara et al., 2008).”