How cultural values affect the impact of abusive supervision on worker attitudes

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review (2015, background): “Subordinates are more likely to have displeased experiences in their daily work which elicit low job satisfaction (Bowling & Michel, 2011; Hobman, Restubog, Bordia, & Tang, 2009; Kernan et al., 2011; Tepper, 2000).”
Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review (2015, unknown): “Scholars have focused on power distance and traditionalism since both constructs reflect employees’ acceptance of the unequal distribution of power and respect of authority in organizations (e.g. Kernan et al. 2011).”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “Because power dynamics are central to understanding supervisor–subordinate relationships, scholars have begun questioning cultural invariance in the accumulated supervisor–subordinaterelated academic knowledge, including abusive supervision research (Hu et al. 2011; Kernan et al. 2011; Tepper 2007).”