Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global bioeconomy

By A. Sheppard, I. Gillespie, Mikael Hirsch, C. Begley. 2011

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3383911e7acf81b4f3f0ae8d14b043402c34c2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. M. Schut
2. L. Klerkx
3. L. Bastiaans
4. J. Rodenburg
5. A. Ast
6. Carmen Priefer
7. J. Jörissen
8. O. Frör

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Wesseler

In Plant Science

1. M. Schut
2. J. Rodenburg
3. Carmen Priefer
4. L. Bastiaans
5. J. Jörissen
6. L. Klerkx
7. O. Frör

Citations in the corpus

• Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research (2014, unknown): “Generally, the land availability and land use competition is described by many as a problem or even the limiting factor for the development of a bioeconomy [5,19,22,24,29,33,34,44,51,52,56,57,63–65,71 ,75 ,77 ,81 ,82 ,84”
• Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review (2014, background): “…2002; Lestrelin et al., 2012; Sheppard et al., 2011), but also issues related to breeding (Siddique et al., 2012), food processing (Glancey et al., 2005), food consumption (Entz et al., 2002; Germer et al., 2011) and agricultural subsidies (Blazy et al., 2010; Sheppard et al., 2011) are discussed.”
• Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy (2017, background): “According to Gottwald, the preservation of the natural living conditions of as many animal and plant species as possible will meet basic human needs as well as economic interests [37].”
• Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators (2021, background): “Several studies [1,11,12] identified several major forces steering the development of the bioeconomy.”
• Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods (2015, unknown): “5.6 Non-food products Non-food products are relevant, considering that with a possible rise of the bio-economy, non-food uses of biomass may increase substantially in future years (Carlson, 2007; Hertel et al., 2013; Sheppard et al., 2011).”