Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice
By Jay R. Corrigan, D. Depositario, R. Nayga, Ximing Wu, Tiffany P. Laude. 2009
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00aa8029a12fa7691ff39daf76c30c2435878875
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Decision Sciences
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis (2018, unknown): “Likewise, articles that did not include a hypothetical treatment were excluded; for instance, Maynard et al. (2004), Alfnes et al. (2006), Corrigan et al. (2009) or Michaud et al. (2013).”
- Developing country consumers’ acceptance of biofortified foods: a synthesis (2015, unknown): “Experimental auctions (such as n price auctions), auction-like mechanisms (such as Becker-DeGrootMarschak mechanism [BDM]) and revealed choice experiments are the most commonly used economic valuation methods for estimating consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for novel goods (see e.g., Lusk and Schroe”
- Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? (2020, background): “Information has been shown to affect consumer acceptance of food produced with novel technologies (Corrigan et al., 2009; Lusk et al. 2004; McFadden, and Huffman, 2017).”