LEARNING OR THERAPY? THE DEMORALISATION OF EDUCATION

By K. Ecclestone. 2004

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c762817e6455227d93d78f513f197bd062f2de10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Terry Hyland
2. S. Clegg
3. Karen Smith
4. S. Bradley
5. D. Hayes
6. K. Ecclestone

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Terry Hyland
2. Karen Smith
3. S. Clegg
4. S. Bradley
5. D. Hayes
6. K. Ecclestone

Citations in the corpus

• ‘I've had to swallow my pride’: help seeking and self‐esteem (2006, background): “Ecclestone (2004a, 2004b) has used Furedi’s ideas to caution against the adoption of ideas of a ‘diminished self’ in education that is in stark contrast to the emphasis on collective reliance championed by Friere (1999).”
• Mindfulness and the Therapeutic Function of Education (2009, background): “She regrets the replacement of ‘optimistic Rogerian ideas about humans’ innate potential and drive for empowerment’ with ‘pessimistic images of people locked in cycles of social depression caused by emotional problems’ (Ecclestone, 2004a, p. 13).”
• Changing the subject: the educational implications of developing emotional well‐being (2009, background): “…been virtually no critical public debate about these developments, claims made for them or their implications for educational goals, subject content and practices (Hayes 2003, 2004; Ecclestone, 2004; Ecclestone et al., 2005; Craig, 2007; Ecclestone & Hayes, 2008, 2009a; Ecclestone et al., 2008a).”
• Resisting images of the ‘diminished self’: the implications of emotional well‐being and emotional engagement in education policy (2007, background): “…and sociology that explores a deep cultural shift from belief in human potential and collective and individual striving for agency towards demoralisation about humanity and people’s capacity for agency (see Nolan, 1998; Furedi, 1999, 2003; Fevre, 2000; Malik, 2001; Sennett, 2003; Ecclestone, 2004).”