Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories

By N. Junker, Rolf van Dick. 2014

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6f9905fbe588ae8f912c163d4feddd64ab961c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. S. A. Haslam
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. M. Platow
4. Niklas K. Steffens
5. K. Munt
6. M. Hogg
7. David de Cremer
8. Barbara van Knippenberg

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Platow
2. S. A. Haslam
3. Niklas K. Steffens
4. K. Munt
5. D. van Knippenberg
6. Rolf van Dick
7. David de Cremer
8. M. Hogg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. S. A. Haslam
3. Niklas K. Steffens
4. M. Platow
5. K. Munt
6. M. Hogg
7. David de Cremer
8. Astrid C. Homan

Citations in the corpus

• Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality (2020, background): “These ideas also resonate with ideas put forward about implicit leadership theories (e.g., Epitropaki et al., 2013; Junker & van Dick, 2014) that distinguish between average and ideal prototypes of leaders in general.”