Evaluating and Reflecting upon a Coach Education Initiative: The CoDe of Rugby

By T. Cassidy, P. Potrac, A. McKenzie. 2006

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6e7aa0af174199671cc742589c43dadaf674890

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Enhancing the provision of coach education: the recommendations of UK coaching practitioners (2013, methodology): “The findings of the present study, therefore build-on a growing body of coaching research that demonstrates the desire for, and educational benefits associated with, group-based discussions (Cassidy, Potrac, and McKenzie 2006; Culver and Trudel 2006; Knowles et al. 2001; Wiersma and Sherman 2005).”
‘Studentship’ and ‘impression management’ in an advanced soccer coach education award (2010, background): “In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the provision of coach education programmes and the importance attached to them (Gilbert & Trudel, 1999; Lyle, 2002; Cassidy et al., 2006).”
Developing coaching pedagogy: seeking a better integration of theory and practice (2012, background): “It is a finding which builds on the work of Cassidy et al. (2006), where coaches considered conversations grounded in everyday issues with peers and colleagues as being vital in their professional development.”
Reflection and reflective practice discourses in coaching: a critical analysis (2018, background): “Cassidy et al., 2009; Cushion et al., 2010; Knowles et al., 2006), with basic description of practice as the first step through to ‘critical reflection’ on assumptions and beliefs underlying practice being the last. The implication being as Fendler (2003) argues, that description is lower order, and”
Understanding Sports Coaching: The Social, Cultural and Pedagogical Foundations of Coaching Practice (2004, background): “Yet a like-minded group does not need to be made up of co- or assistant coaches; it could be administrators, friends, parents, academics or even coaches from rival teams and clubs (for an example of the last of these, see Cassidy et al. 2006a).”
Communities of practice, social learning and networks: exploiting the social side of coach development (2014, background): “…in Lave and Wenger’s (1996) concept of learning within a ‘Community of Practice’ (CoP), which is commonly cited as a mode of facilitating coach development (e.g. Cassidy et al., 2006; Culver & Trudel, 2006) and which is certainly a central tool of national initiatives in the UK (UK Sport, 2010).”
Clarifying the Concept of Communities of Practice in Sport (2008, background): “[15, 46] acknowledged that issues of power differentials and the contestable nature of coaching are obstacles when it comes to nurturing coach CoPs.”