Be Careful What You Ask For: Effects of Response Instructions on the Construct Validity and Reliability of Situational Judgment Tests
By Robert E. Ployhart, Mark G. Ehrhart. 2003
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c64fb3dfbe490f9c5f3a489896245f8c64689974
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Robert E. Ployhart
- William I. MacKenzie
- M. C. Campion
- Michael A. McDaniel
- Filip Lievens
- Eveline Schollaert
- Helga Peeters
- Michael Frese
Citations in the corpus
- The State of Research on Situational Judgment Tests: A Content Analysis and Directions for Future Research (2014, background): “As shown in Table 2, the sample sizes for SJTs in the published literature range from 21 (Ployhart & Ehrhart, 2003) to 20880 (MacKenzie, Ployhart, Weekley, & Ehlers, 2010) with a mean of 680.13 (Mdn = 160), standard deviation of 1918.88, skewness of 7.8 (SE = .19), and kurtosis of 75.31 (SE = .37).”
- Situational judgment tests: A review of recent research (2008, background): “In addition, Ployhart and Ehrhart (2003) found that the type of response instructions influenced the internal consistency.”
- SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS, AND VALIDITY: A META‐ANALYSIS (2007, unknown): “Thus, data from Ployhart and Ehrhart (2003) were not included because the respondents were not employees or applicants, and the criterion was grade point average.”
- Effects of Response Instructions on Faking a Situational Judgment Test (2005, background): “In the only study that investigated the effect of SJT response formats to criterion-related validities, Ployhart and Ehrhart (2003) found that the Behavioral Tendency response instruction consistently yielded higher criterion-related validity coefficients than did the Knowledge response instruction.”
- A SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TEST OF PERSONAL INITIATIVE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERFORMANCE (2009, methodology): “Past research has also found sufficient stability of SJTs over time to use them in selection (e.g. Ployhart & Ehrhart, 2003).”