Reading your Counterpart: The Benefit of Emotion Recognition Accuracy for Effectiveness in Negotiation

By Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Maw-Der Foo, Judith B. White, H. Tan, V. C. Aik. 2006

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using meta-analysis, we find a consistent positive correlation between emotion recognition accuracy (ERA) and goal-oriented performance. However, this existing research relies primarily on subjective perceptions of performance. The current study tested the impact of ERA on objective performance in a mixed-motive buyer-seller negotiation exercise. Greater recognition of posed facial expressions predicted better objective outcomes for participants from Singapore playing the role of seller, both in terms of creating value and claiming a greater share for themselves. The present study is distinct from past research on the effects of individual differences on negotiation outcomes in that it uses a performance-based test rather than self-reported measure. These results add to evidence for the predictive validity of emotion recognition measures on practical outcomes.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5cf3f1ad2fe912dfd36297475608099ad605988

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

  1. Gerben A. van Kleef
  2. A. S. R. Manstead
  3. Carsten K. W. De Dreu
  4. Stéphane Côté
  5. E. Vigoda-Gadot
  6. Galit Meisler
  7. Blair Kidwell
  8. D. Hardesty

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Gerben A. van Kleef
  2. A. S. R. Manstead
  3. Carsten K. W. De Dreu
  4. Stéphane Côté
  5. Galit Meisler
  6. Blair Kidwell
  7. E. Vigoda-Gadot
  8. Shibin Sheng

Citations in the corpus