Challengers, Elites, and Owning Families: A Social Class Theory of Corporate Acquisitions in the 1960s
By Donald Palmer, Brad M. Barber. 2001
379 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5bde465d9e12de5c3711d371e6aff67ae26ad9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- James J. Chrisman
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- M. Carney
- Alfredo De Massis
- Eric Gedajlovic
- Pietro Mazzola
- Torsten M. Pieper
- Salvatore Sciascia
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- James J. Chrisman
- Eric Gedajlovic
- M. Carney
- Torsten M. Pieper
- Pietro Mazzola
- Salvatore Sciascia
- Alfredo De Massis
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- James J. Chrisman
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Alfredo De Massis
- M. Carney
- Pietro Mazzola
- Eric Gedajlovic
- Torsten M. Pieper
- Salvatore Sciascia
Citations in the corpus
- Punctuated Generosity (2013, background): “Thus, in line with Davis and Greve (1997) and Palmer and Barber (2001), we gave observations values from the closest year for which interlocks data were available .”
- The Adolescence of Family Firm Research (2012, background): “This perspective originates in historical and sociological accounts of how wealthy families are primarily motivated to preserve their economic and social status (Palmer & Barber, 2001).”
- Resource Dependence Theory: A Review (2009, background): “…include the historical context of the firm (Finkelstein, 1997), industry environment (Hitt & Tyler, 1991), environmental munificence and dynamism (Heeley, King, & Covin, 2006), prevailing institutional norms (Palmer & Barber, 2001), and internal considerations (Campling & Michelson, 1998).”
- Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis With Recommendations (2005, background): “For example, Li and Rowley (2002) reported correlations for all 17 of their MCVs, and Palmer and Barber (2001) reported correlations for 20.”
- FLATTERY WILL GET YOU EVERYWHERE (ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A MALE CAUCASIAN): HOW INGRATIATION, BOARDROOM BEHAVIOR, AND DEMOGRAPHIC MINORITY STATUS AFFECT ADDITIONAL BOARD APPOINTMENTS AT U.S. COMPANIES (2007, methodology): “A fourth variable, listing in Social Register/attendance at exclusive prep school, indicated whether a director had attended an exclusive preparatory school or been listed in the Social Register, with exclusive preparatory school designations taken from Palmer and Barber (2001) (see also Domhoff, ”
- Why are Some Organizations More Competitive than Others? Evidence from a Changing Global Market (2004, background): “Each of these logics has dynamic implications for organizational size.”
- Pluralistic Ignorance in Corporate Boards and Firms' Strategic Persistence in Response to Low Firm Performance (2005, background): “…affiliation (i.e., a degree from a prestigious institution) can provide a meaningful basis for social categorization (Useem and Karabel, 1986; Palmer and Barber, 2001); an Ivy League education, in particular, remains a salient indicator of social status among corporate leaders (Baltzell,…”
- Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non‐Family Businesses* (2007, background): “Whereas some companies prefer one-shot opportunities that can be realized quickly, family businesses are believed to be more interested in building enduring networks and associations with clients and other suppliers of valuable resources (Gomez-Mejia et al., 2001; Palmer and Barber, 2001).”
- Managerial Risk Taking (2016, neutral): “Conversely, greater experience in finance, accounting, or law leads to greater diversification via acquisitions (Finkelstein, 1992; Fligstein, 1990; Jensen & Zajac, 2004; Palmer & Barber, 2001; Song, 1982).”
- Can Directors Impact Performance? A case‐based test of three theories of corporate governance (2007, neutral): “Researchers such as Hillman et al. (2000) and Palmer and Barber (2001) view the board as a potentially important resource for the corporation, especially in its links with the external environment.”
- The Pre-Deal Phase of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “Other studies have examined the social standing of TMT members and concluded that social status allows TMT members to identify a larger Welch et al. / The Pre-Deal Phase of M&A 849 number of M&A opportunities (El-Khatib, Fogel, & Jandik, 2015; Palmer & Barber, 2001).”
- Markets, Hierarchies, and Families: Toward a Transaction Cost Theory of the Family Firm (2010, neutral): “Relatedly, family managers may have the discretion and incentive to invest in bridging forms of social capital because they and their families can derive non-economic benefits of status and prestige from investing in such assets (Palmer & Barber, 2001).”