The Adolescence of Family Firm Research

By Eric Gedajlovic, M. Carney, James J. Chrisman, Franz Willi Kellermanns. 2012

448 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/574da9059f97cccea83c1ca220b4cd465d39fbee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Family Ownership and R&D Intensity in Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Firms (2015, unknown): “Specifically, it is contended that in the context of SMEs, where goals are more fluid and mixed (Kotlar & De Massis, 2013; Gedajlovic et al., 2012), and when there is a high overlap between family wealth and firm equity (i.e., most of the family’s wealth is invested in the firm), the relationship…”
Family control and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China (2015, background): “…that the behavior of family firms are shaped by the culture, and psychological and social factors (Gomez-Mejia et al., 2011; Mehrotra et al., 2013; Gedajlovic et al., 2012; Bennedsen et al., 2014), so it is worthwhile investigating whether and how the unique characteristics of Chinese family…”
Article Commentary: Family, Wealth, and Governance: An Agency Account (2015, background): “We also extend the family business group literature (Almeida & Wolfenzon, 2006; Carney & Child, 2013; Gedajlovic et al., 2012; Luo & Chung, 2005) in that we show (1) how multiple types of (not only corporate) assets are controlled by a”
Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges (2011, background): “On the whole, contextual factors appear to have a strong explanatory power in terms of the competitiveness of a particular firm (Gedajlovic et al., 2010).”
CEO Succession Mechanisms, Organizational Context, and Performance: A Socio‐Emotional Wealth Perspective on Family‐Controlled Firms (2014, unknown): “This is in line with the current debate in the family business field about the ‘bright’ and the ‘dark’ sides of family involvement in governance and managerial positions (e.g., Gedajlovic et al., 2012; Minichilli et al., 2010; Schulze et al., 2001).”
What do we know about Private Family Firms? A Meta–Analytical Review (2015, unknown): “Recently, family business scholars have advanced new theories suggesting that family firms can embody socially complex and causally ambiguous organizational processes related to their dual economic and social motives (Gedajlovic et al., 2012), which enhance their abilities to develop and utilize tac”
The Resilient Family Firm: Stakeholder Outcomes and Institutional Effects (2015, unknown): “Due to the family’s superior abilities in cultivating and leveraging their social and reputational capital (Arregle, Hitt, Sirmon, & Very, 2007; Gedajlovic et al., 2012), FCFs are viewed as possessing value enhancing advantages compared with N-FCFs.”