Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology.

By Kuo-shu Yang. 2000

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c35ae5c8390c92ad6b68c92626f1cc0411844b8d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of relational orientation as measured by face and renqing in innovative behavior in China: An indigenous analysis (2014, methodology): “Our research assumes an indigenous perspective (e.g., Kim & Berry, 1993; Yang, 2000), and is primarily grounded in research on Chinese culture and cross-cultural research on creativity, although we also take into account relevant Western research and theorizing.”
Colonialism and Psychology of Culture (2008, background): “Ideologically, indigenous psychology strives toward developing a ‘system of psychological knowledge based on scientific research that is sufficiently compatible with the studied phenomena and their ecological, economic, social, cultural, and historical contexts’ (Yang, 2000, 245).”
Individual-oriented and socially oriented cultural conceptions of subjective well-being: Conceptual analysis and scale development (2006, methodology): “Yang (2000) has advocated a ‘cross-cultural indigenous approach’ (CCI) that seeks to solve the twin problems of scientific ethnocentrism and cross-cultural equivalence that have troubled mainstream cross-cultural psychology for decades.”
The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Role of Climate Regarding Ethics (2008, background): “Transformational leadership from the West and paternalistic leadership from the East may contain general transnational behaviors that are applicable across cultures, as well as emic/local behaviors that are unique and only applicable in a particular cultural setting (Yang, 2000).”
Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis (2006, background): “The major purposes of the international academic movement of psychological indigenization are at least fourfold: (1) to point out that Western dominance is unhealthy, not only to the development of meaningful and useful psychologies in non‐Western cultures, but also to the construction of a comprehe”
Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case (2009, background): “For instance, Bechtel et al. (2006) indicated that their results “support the idea of particular psychologies that are culture-dependent as Triandis (2000) and Yang (2000), among others, suggest.””
On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests (2018, background): “Cultural phenomena can be studied in various ways: from an indigenous (e.g., Yang, 2000), cultural (e.g., Shweder & Sullivan, 1993), and cross-cultural perspective.”
Social Axioms (2002, background): “This procedure allows the integration of emic and etic perspectives (Yang, 2000), and it will be possible to determine how indigenous items relate to the five belief dimensions already identified.”
Methodological and theoretical issues on psychological traditionality and modernity research in an Asian society: In response to Kwang‐Kuo Hwang and beyond (2003, background): “This double-indigenous requirement for the psychological content of individual T/M fulfills the essential prerequisite of the cross-cultural indigenous approach (Yang, 2000).”
‘The double identity’ of Taiwanese Chinese: A dilemma of politics and culture rooted in history (2003, background): “Measures included both English language measures important from previous research and indigenous measures written in Chinese (Yang, 2000).”