Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “…SET is obviously used for formative purposes (e.g., as feedback for the improvement of teaching) as well as for summative purposes (e.g., mapping teaching competence for administrative decision-making and institutional audits; Arthur, 2009; Burden, 2008; Edström, 2008; Emery, Kramer, & Tian, 2003).”
Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests (2019, background): “As a result, assessment has been reported as the most e ﬀ ective way to improve of students´ achievement quality (Edström, 2008).”
Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? (2014, background): “…most important outcome of completing evaluations as them offering meaningful feedback that will lead to an improvement in lecturers’ teaching practice; however, this does not mean that all feedback has agency or that merely following student comments will lead to flawless teaching (Edström 2008).”