of Intelligence and Personality
By Robert P. Hogan, J. Hogan, P. Barrett. 2008
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2da02b1f72c1d21409b9e16d0f8c9c24af50127
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Thomas Goetz
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Nathan C. Hall
- J. Mayer
- Peter Salovey
- Colin G. DeYoung
- D. Caruso
- Scott Barry Kaufman
Citations in the corpus
- Cybernetic Big Five Theory. (2015, methodology): “Other methods of assessing traits, such as performance or decision-making tasks, do not rely as heavily on subjective interpretation, but, with a few exceptions (e.g., traits related to cognitive ability), they have been much less well developed than questionnaire measures (DeYoung, 2011).”
- The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates (2016, background): “Neuroticism correlates at r = −.15, and openness about r = .30 (DeYoung, 2011).”
- Brother–sister differences in the g factor in intelligence: analysis of full, opposite-sex siblings from the NLSY1979 (2007, background): “, 2006) of the “more so” nature of males (Heim, 1970).”
- Emotional experiences during test taking : does cognitive ability make a difference? (2007, background): “Numerous studies have also demonstrated that self-efficacy expectancies positively correspond with cognitive ability levels (Bandura, 1986; Roznowski, Reith, & Hong, 2000; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”
- On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, background): “…& Deary, 2002; Baron, 1982; Bates & Shieles, 2003; Cacioppo et al., 1996; Eysenck, 1994; Goff & Ackerman, 1992; Kanazawa, 2004; Kokis et al., 2002; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000) have indicated that measures of intelligence display only moderate to weak correlations (usually less than .30) with some…”
- From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex (2012, methodology): “We believe what they have in common is cognitive exploration of the structure of experience (DeYoung, 2011; DeYoung et al., 2005; Van Egeren, 2009), with intelligence and other traits related to Intellect emphasizing exploration of abstract information, and apophenia and other traits related to…”