Cybernetic Big Five Theory.

By Colin G. DeYoung. 2015

854 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/432f424abfc5891b009f89eeb3ed112e664af50e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Cybernetic Theory of Psychopathology (2018, background): “Whereas Neuroticism reflects sensitivity to threat and punishment, Extraversion reflects sensitivity to reward (DeYoung, 2015; Wacker & Smillie, 2015).”
Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis (2016, background): “Importantly, recentworks have demonstrated that two distinct aspects of openness trait – Openness and Intellect (DeYoung, 2015) influence creativity differently: while Openness predicts creative achievement in the arts, Intellect predicts creative achievement in science-related domains (S.”
Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality (2016, background): “The GFP model has had an especially strong impact on the evolutionary psychology community, with researchers arguing that the GFP reflects variability in life history strategies, with one pole of the GFP corresponding with a slow (K-selected) life history strategy, and the other pole corresponding w”
Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, methodology): “The preceding interpersonal reformulation of personality dynamics proceeds naturally from recently proposed models in basic personality psychology (e.g. Back et al., 2011; Baumert et al., 2017; DeYoung, 2015; Fleeson, 2001; Roberts, 2018; Wessels et al., 2016; Wrzus & Roberts, 2017).”
A model for personality at three levels (2015, background): “…rule include Ackerman (1997), Ackerman and Heggestad (1997), Deary, Whiteman, Starr, Whalley, and Fox (2004), Deary (2008), Deary et al. (2013), DeYoung (2014), Ferriman, Lubinski, and Benbow (2009), Gottfredson (1997), Lubinski and Benbow (2000), Lubinski, Webb, Morelock, and Benbow (2001),…”
Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits (2020, background): “Many researchers now agree that population-level personality variation is best represented as a hierarchy of increasingly specific traits, with no level uniquely representing nature carved at its joints (DeYoung, 2015; Markon et al., 2005; McCrae & Sutin, 2018).”
Self-Actualizing People in the 21st Century: Integration With Contemporary Theory and Research on Personality and Well-Being (2018, background): “…express doubts”), and a lack of authenticity and meaning (“feel that my life lacks direction,” “act or feel in a way that does not fit me”).1 According to DeYoung (2015), low levels of Stability can “cause difficulty in developing and maintaining effective characteristic adaptations, due to…”
Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures (2020, neutral): “…Wrzus & Roberts, 2017) and that (ii) most recent personality theories posit that personality traits are expressed in states (Baumert et al., 2017; DeYoung, 2015; Eaton, South, & Krueger, 2009; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; Funder, 2001; Horstmann, Rauthmann, Sherman, & Ziegler, in revision;…”
Longitudinal Experience–Wide Association Studies—A Framework for Studying Personality Change (2020, background): “However, we acknowledge the value of narrower and broader traits beyond the Big Five (Ashton & Lee, 2007; Mõttus, Kandler, Bleidorn, Riemann, & McCrae, 2017; Orth & Robins, 2014), most of which can be organized within a broad and inclusive hierarchical framework (Markon, Krueger, & Watson, 2005), an”
Whole Trait Theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process (2019, neutral): “…et al., 2012; Hampson, 2012), and have focused on describing the what, but for the most part have not attempted to explain the why or how (see Depue & Collins, 1999; DeYoung, 2010; DeYoung et al., 2010; Eysenck, 1997; Gray, 1981; see also DeYoung, 2015 and Read et al., 2010 for exceptions to this).”
Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure—and why those Objections Fail (2020, background): “…have downplayed the distinctiveness of the HEXACO model by suggesting that it simply splits the broad Big Five Agreeableness factor into two sub-factors (e.g. DeYoung, 2015; McCrae & Costa, 2008; Van Kampen, 2012; Watson, Stasik, Ellickson-Larew, & Stanton, 2015), one of which is Honesty-Humility.”
Evaluating the validity of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator theory: A teaching tool and window into intuitive psychology (2019, methodology): “The number of dimensions personality has is a function of the methodology used to examine it (DeYoung, 2014).”
A Meta–Analytic and Conceptual Update on the Associations between Procrastination and Multidimensional Perfectionism (2017, methodology): “According to the Cybernetic Big Five theory (DeYoung, 2014, 2015), the higher-order personality factors, conscientiousness and (low) neuroticism, are two of three superordinate traits key for successful Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology Eur.”
A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO (2019, result): “Some may see in the above results confirmation of the position, advocated by some B5 researchers (DeYoung, 2015; Viswesvaran & Ones, 2016), that Honesty-Humility is not much more than a facet of Agreeableness.”
The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people (2018, background): “The fact that curiosity is nested under openness to experience but positive affect is nested under extraversion (e.g., DeYoung, 2015) offers support for the distinction between curiosity and positivity/happiness.”