Expertise, Domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique.

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the consensual assessment technique for creativity research. (2019, background): “Likewise, this is a point raised by Kaufman, Baer, and Cole (2009), who found that the agreement between novices and experts was higher for short stories than poetry, indicating a domain or task interaction.”
Evaluation of Self-Perceptions of Creativity: Is It a Useful Criterion? (2012, background): “Kaufman et al. (2010) tested fourth graders in four domains of creativity (math, science, art, and writing) with a self-assessment and a rated creative product.”
Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? (2013, methodology): “Taken together, this study suggests that novices are not appropriate substitutes for experts in providing creativity ratings (consistent with Kaufman et al., 2009).”
Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creative? (2012, background): “The nonexperts, like the experts, showed fairly strong agreement; the two groups were correlated at r¼ .69 (comparable to subsequent findings by Kaufman et al., 2009).”