The Construct of Creativity: Structural Model for Self‐Reported Creativity Ratings

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluation of Self-Perceptions of Creativity: Is It a Useful Criterion? (2012, background): “Kaufman et al. (2009) found that the 7-factor model was best interpreted as being a reflection of a hierarchical second-order factor of creativity.”
Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) (2012, background): “More than 3,500 people completed the CDQ, and Kaufman, Cole, and Baer (2009) found seven factors, which they dubbed Artistic-Verbal, Artistic-Visual, Entrepreneur, Interpersonal, Math/Science, Performance, and Problem Solving.”
The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC (2016, background): “…often the multidimensional structureof creative self-concepts, organized by content-domains(Karwowski & Barbot, 2016; Kaufman & Baer, 2004; Kaufman, Cole, & Baer, 2009; Kaufman, 2012; Vispoel, 1993), and by studies exploring actual creative behaviors or achievements,also outliningthe…”
Perceiving benefits after adversity: The relationship between self-reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. (2013, methodology): “Domains selected were categorized according to the seven empirically derived overarching areas described by Kaufman, Cole, and Baer (2009): artistic/verbal, artistic/visual, entrepreneur, interpersonal, math/science, performance, and problemsolving.”