Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation.
By Paul J Silvia, Benjamin Wigert, R. Reiter‐Palmon, James C. Kaufman. 2012
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db21f917ce08f39298b8db07a64dcc70788f3563
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- Roger E. Beaty
- James C. Kaufman
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- D. Johnson
- Paul J Silvia
- Mathias Benedek
- Eva Kyndt
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Roger E. Beaty
- Paul J Silvia
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- Scott Barry Kaufman
- James C. Kaufman
- D. Johnson
- Mathias Benedek
- Emanuel Jauk
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Paul J Silvia
- Roger E. Beaty
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- Mathias Benedek
- James C. Kaufman
- Emanuel Jauk
- Aljoscha C. Neubauer
- D. Johnson
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring the Link Between Mind Wandering, Mindfulness, and Creativity: A Multidimensional Approach (2018, neutral): “The CAQ was designed to capture eminent-level creativity (Silvia et al., 2012), and it focuses on significant, observable accomplishments.”
- Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, methodology): “As the distribution of creative achievement was heavily skewed with many zero values, traditional regression methods cannot be employed due to violations of the assumptions of normal residuals and homoscedasticity (Silvia & Kimbrel, 2010; Silvia et al., 2012).”
- Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “Finally, many of the self-report measures of creativity yield significantly skewed scores (e.g. CBI, CAQ and BICB), which calls for special statistical methods to manipulate this type of data (Silvia et al.,2012).”
- Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) (2012, methodology): “The test is frequently used and shows strong validity and reliability (Silvia et al., 2012).”
- Ready, Set, Create: What Instructing People to "Be Creative" Reveals About the Meaning and Mechanisms of Divergent Thinking (2014, methodology): “…of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts © 2014 American Psychological Association 2014, Vol. 8, No. 2, 000 1931-3896/14/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0036549 1 Silvia et al., 2008), and formulas and algorithms (Bossomaier, Harré, Knittel, & Snyder, 2009; Prabhakaran, Green, & Gray, in press).”
- Preservice Teachers' Personality Traits and Engagement in Creative Activities as Predictors of Their Support for Children's Creativity (2014, background): “The recent study by Silvia et al. (2012) examined CFA of the 28-item CBI.”
- Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance (2020, methodology): “Note that the task duration was considerably longer than previous studies due to the temporal focus of Beaty and Silvia (2012).”