An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making

By J. Paolillo, S. Vitell. 2002

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1e91bd2ac3ee44613d4112dba90684a6c3d4e63

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Information Systems and Management

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Effects of the Use of the Availability Heuristic on Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations (2009, background): “Various business disciplines have reacted to the ethics scandals by examining aspects of Rest’s (1986) ethical decision-making model (Douglas et al., 2001; Leitsche, 2004; Paolillo and Vitell, 2002).”
Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity (2007, methodology): “…application of the method has become widespread in studies of ethics (Barnett & Vaicys, 2000; Eastman, Eastman, & Tolson, 2001; Forte, 2004; Mayo & Marks, 1990; Paolillo & Vitell, 2002) in part because of risk minimization and the direct measure of decision making provided by these measures.”
ARTICLES: Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures (2006, methodology): “Similar strategies for validating ethical decision making measures have been applied by Paolillo and Vitell (2002); Roosen, Pelsmacker, and Bostyn (2001); and Trevino and Youngblood (1990).”
The Antecedents of Moral Imagination in the Workplace: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective (2013, unknown): “Indeed, this assertion has received some empirical support in vignette-based studies (e.g., May and Pauli 2002; Nill and Schibrowsky 2005; Paolillo and Vitell 2002).”
Blind forces (2014, result): “…behavior as reported by organizational members (e.g., Marta, Singhapakdi, & Higgs-Kleyn, 2001; Mayer, Kuenzi, Greenbaum, Bardes, & Salvador, 2009; Paolillo & Vitell, 2002; Ross & Robertson, 2003; Schaubroeck, Hannah, Avolio, Kozlowski, & Lord, 2012; Sweeney, Arnold, & Pierce, 2010; Treviño,…”
Ethics Code Awareness, Perceived Ethical Values, and Organizational Commitment (2003, unknown): “This scale has been utilized extensively in past research (e.g., Bhuian and Menguc 2002; Paolillo and Vitell 2002; Singhapakdi, Vitell, and Franke 1999; Valentine and Barnett 2002; Valentine, Godkin, and Lucero 2002).”
The Impact of Ethical Ideologies, Moral Intensity, and Social Context on Sales-Based Ethical Reasoning (2011, background): “…2000; Bass et al., 1998; McCabe et al., 1996; Treviño and Youngblood 1990; Valentine and Barnett, 2007), but few studies investigate the degree to which all the three levels might simultaneously impact the process (e.g., Douglas et al., 2001; Paolillo and Vitell, 2002; Singhapakdi et al., 1999).”