Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling

By Gordon W. Cheung, Roger B. Rensvold. 2000

623 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Food Science, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1a38fd43aebece64d6ca543255a419eb6e7cf81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Food Science

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Study of Anxiety, Fear, and Behavioral Inhibition System Measures (2007, background): “Third, it should be noted that there has been some debate about the proper sequence of steps involved in testing for invariance (Byrne, 1998; Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; Vandenberg & Lance, 2000; Steenkamp & Baumgartner, 1998).”
Methodological issues in international HR management research (2012, methodology): “One way to test for this is to use MACS analyses – multiple-group mean and covariance structures (Cheung and Rensvold 2000 ).”
The Influence of Subjective Norms on Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Investigation (2013, background): “make comparisons (Chen et al. 2005; Byrne 2006; Burns et al. 2006; Cheung and Rensvold 2000; Little 2000; Vandenberg and Lance 2000).”
Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures (2002, methodology): “As one example of a possible approach, Cheung and Rensvold (2000) tested hypotheses with regard to potential antecedents (i.e., extreme and acquiescence response sets) for not supporting invariance.”
Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries (2003, methodology): “It is also particularly suited for testing measurement equivalence in cross-cultural research as already demonstrated by different applications and recent methodological developments (Caprara, Barbaranelli, Bermudez, Maslach, & Ruch, 2000; Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; Little, 1997; Steenkamp & Baumgar”
Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research (2008, methodology): “…and multiple group mean and covariance structures analysis (MACS) also provide information about biased items or indicators (e.g., Byrne, 2004; Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; Little, 1997, 2000), with the MACS method also providing information about mean differences between groups on latent…”
A Direct Comparison Approach for Testing Measurement Invariance (2012, background): “Specifically, standardizing the construct variance assumes that the variances of the construct are equal across groups, which may be untenable especially in cross-national comparisons where the samples are drawn from two populations (Cheung & Rensvold, 2000).”
Adjustment for Acquiescence in the Assessment of the Construct Equivalence of Likert-Type Score Items (2003, background): “It has also been argued (Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; van Herk, 2000) that acquiescence might differ across cultural groups.”
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias (2004, methodology): “In the meantime, appropriate statistics are available that can detect item bias ( Cheung & Rensvold, 2000 ) or differential item functioning (Van de Vijver & Leung, 1997) across different cultural samples.”
Standardization in psychological research. (2010, background): “There are two particular types of response styles that have been widely discussed in the literature (Baumgartner & Steenkamp, 2001; Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; Fischer et al., 2009).”
The Index of Cultural Tightness and Looseness Among 68 Countries (2015, background): “However, it is important to emphasize that neither ARS nor ERS is identical with the SD (Cheung & Rensvold, 2000).”
Negative practice–value correlations in the GLOBE data: Unexpected findings, questionnaire limitations and research directions (2010, methodology): “A number of methods for correcting for response style bias have been offered (e.g., Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; van de Vijver & Leung, 1997), and future research may want to reexamine the GLOBE study data to see whether accounting for the response set would change the conclusions, in particular with…”
Construct Equivalence across Groups: An Unexplored Issue in Mentoring Research (2005, background): “…EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT may also reflect the fact that the same mentoring instrument might be measuring different constructs in different groups rather than suggesting that the groups vary on the same constructs (Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; WhitesideMansell & Corwyn, 2003).”
Communication Styles as Dimensions of National Culture (2011, background): “However, other authors have noted the statistical problems inherent in ipsatization procedures (Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; Fischer, 2004), and some researchers have preferred to define their dimensions using unstandardized data (Bond et al., 2004; Inglehart, 1997; Minkov, 2007).”