Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures

By Robert J. Vandenberg. 2002

483 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc4f6fa8eb280a0ddeab2762bf5f1b3375051658

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Eldad Davidov
2. Alexandre J. S. Morin
3. Michael S. Cole
4. John P. Meyer
5. Heike Bruch
6. Adam W. Meade
7. W. H. Finch
8. Brian French

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Michael S. Cole
2. Alexandre J. S. Morin
3. Heike Bruch
4. Eldad Davidov
5. Herbert W. Marsh
6. Robert J. Vandenberg
7. John P. Meyer
8. Ulla Kinnunen *

Citations in the corpus

• A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples (2012, methodology): “After all, measurement invariance of the values is required before cross-cultural comparisons may be carried out meaningfully (Billiet 2003; De Beuckelaer 2005; Steenkamp and Baumgartner 1998; Vandenberg 2002).”
• Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter? (2006, methodology): “groups unless the measures operationalizing the focal constructs exhibit measurement equivalence across the comparison groups (cf. Cheung & Rensvold, 2002; Vandenberg, 2002).”
• Bringing Values Back In The Adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries (2008, background): “6 Several sources provide details on measuring invariance (e.g., Cheung and Rensvold 2002; De Beuckelaer 2005; Steenkamp and Baumgartner 1998; Vandenberg 2002; Vandenberg and Lance 2000).”
• A Direct Comparison Approach for Testing Measurement Invariance (2012, unknown): “In this case, the validity of the results of the metric invariance test may be jeopardized (refer to Cheung & Rensvold, 1999, Appendix B, for a detailed mathematical demonstration), as may the results from subsequent tests following this test of metric invariance (Vandenberg, 2002).”
• Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures for the Determination of Measurement Invariance (2006, background): “Furthermore, many questions remain about the procedures (e.g., accuracy, influence of partial invariance, influence of the selected reference indicator, etc.; Millsap, 2005; Vandenberg, 2002).”
• The Construct and Measurement of Peace of Mind (2013, background): “CES-D Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression Scale, STAI-state State Trait Anxiety Inventory-state subscale, Sig. of FChange significance of FChange 1999; Little 1997; Vandenberg 2002; Whiteside-Mansell and Corwyn 2003).”
• Problems With Item Parceling for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Tests of Measurement Invariance (2006, methodology): “…been a substantial increase in research involving tests of MI due in part to an increased awareness of both the importance of comparing equivalent measures as well as increased access and understanding of the methodology used to perform tests of MI (Meade & Lautenschlager, 2004b; Vandenberg, 2002).”
• A person‐centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology (2016, methodology): “In variable-centered studies (Vandenberg, 2002; Vandenberg & Lance, 2000), comparison of results across subpopulations typically starts with the investigation of the equivalence of the measurement model underlying the constructs (in terms of number of factors, type of model, and”
• The Measurement Equivalence of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Transformational Leadership (2006, methodology): “Phase 2 tested for metric invariance to determine if factor loadings for items were equal across administration modes ( Vandenberg, 2002 ).”
• MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE 1 Running Head : MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values . A Test across Eight Countries (2014, background): “However, the full measurement invariance needed for meaningful cross-cultural comparison (Steenkamp & Baumgartner, 1998; Chen, 2008; Vandenberg, 2002; Vandenberg & Lance, 2000) has rarely been established.”
• Biased latent variable mean comparisons due to measurement noninvariance. A simulation study (2018, unknown): “, & Vandenberg, R. J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modelling methods for organizational and management research.”