CEO Turnover and Properties of Accounting Information
By Ellen Engel, Rachel M. Hayes, Xue Wang. 2003
319 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c170fd17a74bd74a4c57fd850b4836a9cc66337e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Christian Leuz
- W. Guay
- Christopher S. Armstrong
- Robert M. Bushman
- Weili Ge
- Catherine Schrand
- Patricia M. Dechow
- Martin Walker
In Strategy and Management
- Christopher S. Armstrong
- W. Guay
- Weili Ge
- Catherine Schrand
- Joseph P. Weber
- Patricia M. Dechow
- Carla K. Hayn
- Dan Givoly
Citations in the corpus
- The Limitations of Industry Concentration Measures Constructed with Compustat Data: Implications for Finance Research (2009, unknown): “…and Massa 2006), mergers and acquisitions (Song and Walkling 2000; Fee and Thomas 2004; Shahrur 2005), corporate governance (DeFond and Park 1999; Engel, Hayes, and Wang 2003; Rennie 2006; Karuna 2007), capital structure (Lang and Stulz 1992; Kale and Shahrur 2007), corporate disclosure…”
- The Role of Information and Financial Reporting in Corporate Governance and Debt Contracting (2010, background): “Engel et al. (2003) find that the weight placed on earnings in the CEO turnover decision is increasing in the timeliness of earnings, measured as the R2 from a reverse regression of earnings on returns, and decreasing in the variance of earnings, which proxies for its noise.”
- Investor Perceptions of Board Performance: Evidence from Uncontested Director Elections (2009, methodology): “More recent studies assessing turnover prediction also observe an association between past measures of financial performance, such as industry-adjusted ROA, and CEO turnover (see, for example, Huson et al., 2001 and Engel et al., 2003).”
- Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences (2010, background): “Engel et al. (2003) is the only study that provides evidence on the turnover consequences of earnings informativeness rather than extreme, and detected, earnings management.”
- A review of the IFRS adoption literature (2016, background): “For example, Lambert and Larcker (1987) and Engel et al. (2003) document a substitution between accounting- and market-based performance measures.”
- Measuring Reporting Conservatism (2007, methodology): “29 Engel et al. (2003) use as their measure of timeliness the R2 rather than the slope coefficient β2 (the DT measure) from Basu’s regression (regression (1) in this paper).”
- Risk and CEO turnover (2010, background): “Engel, Hayes, and Wang (2003) study the properties of accounting information and CEO turnover, and Farrell and Whidbee (2003) examine performance expectations and CEO turnover.”
- Management Forecast Accuracy and CEO Turnover (2012, methodology): “We use analyst forecast errors, industry-adjusted earnings, and market-adjusted returns to control for firm performance and Earn_Vol and Ret_Vol to control for risk (Coughlan and Schmidt 1985; Warner et al. 1988; Murphy and Zimmerman 1993; DeFond and Park 1999; Engel et al. 2003; Farrell and Whidbee”
- Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions (2003, unknown): “Engel et al. (2002) use the ratio of the industry-adjusted variance of earnings divided by the industry-adjusted variance of monthly stock returns.”
- Director Ownership, Governance, and Performance (2013, methodology): “The control variables are motivated by a substantial extant literature on performance and CEO turnover (e.g., see Huson et al. (2001), Farrell and Whidbee (2003), and Engel, Hayes, and Wang (2003)).”
- On Guidance and Volatility (2015, background): “…in promoting a reputation for transparency, attracting analyst following, and constraining price volatility, when explaining why they are committed to guidance (Graham et al. 2005; Johnson 2009; National Investor Relations Institute 2009).1 Thus, from some managers’ points of view,…”