The Limitations of Industry Concentration Measures Constructed with Compustat Data: Implications for Finance Research
By Ashiq Ali. 2009
431 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ee65fecf3d6854982ff2a30bbc2cf21b0f22fd3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Philip G. Berger
- Sandy Klasa
- Roni Michaely
- Gustavo Grullon
- Eric Yeung
- Darren Bernard
- Daniel A. Bens
- S. Monahan
In Strategy and Management
- Sandy Klasa
- Philip G. Berger
- Eric Yeung
- Daniel A. Bens
- Darren Bernard
- Roni Michaely
- S. Monahan
- Gustavo Grullon
Citations in the corpus
- Product Market Competition, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from the EU Area (2011, neutral): “Ali et al. (2009), however, argue that competition measures calculated exclusively with Compustat data, and thereby only covering the public firms within an industry, are poor proxies for actual competition.”
- Product market competition and conditional conservatism (2014, neutral): “A criticism of this measure is that it does not consider private firms in a given industry (Ali et al. 2009). In fact, industry concentration measures using U.S. Census Bureau data, which covers both private and public firms, are weakly correlated (13 %) to the industry concentration measures based ”
- Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated (2019, positive): “Since Ali, Klasa, and Yeung (2009) demonstrate that Compustat and Census-based concentration ratios have low correlation and may lead to opposite conclusions, we want to ensure that the increase in concentration is not sensitive to the choice of concentration measure.”
- Examining the influence of service additions on manufacturing firms' bankruptcy likelihood (2017, methodology): “In this way, we could ensure that our dataset contained no missing values (LOGIT requires complete case analysis) and we could also reliably use the Compustat database for industry-level data (Ali et al., 2009).”
- Client importance and audit partner independence (2012, background): “Even in the sample period from 2001 to 2004, which Chen et al. (2010) characterize as an 5 Ali et al. (2009) suggest the importance of including private (unlisted) firms in another context.”
- Redacting Proprietary Information at the Initial Public Offering (2015, background): “Ali, Klasa, and Yeung (2009) speculate that the mixed evidence could stem from problems with traditional measures of competition.”
- Corporate Suppliers and Customers and Accounting Conservatism (2012, methodology): “10 Ali et al. (2009) show that when using U.”