From Thought and Experience to Behavior and Interpersonal Relationships: A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity

By M. Kernis, B. Goldman. 2005

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0a30f22cb788a7bfb02069ac32ea7e11f4df529

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

How Authentic Leadership Promotes Individual Creativity: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment (2020, background): “Prior studies have also proposed that a core AL construct can be extracted from the relationships among the four components (Gardner et al., 2005; Kernis & Goldman, 2005; Rego et al., 2012; Rego et al., 2013; Walumbwa et al., 2008).”
Authenticity, Social Context, and Well-Being in the United States, England, and Russia (2013, background): “From this philosophical survey, four dimensions of authenticity were derived: (a) an awareness of one’s self, attributes, and capacities; (b) an unbiased and accurate self-view; (c) the tendency for honest self-expression to others; and (d) openness within relationships (Kernis & Goldman, 2005).”
A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research (2006, methodology): “AUTHENTICITY 311 As shown in Table III, the findings obtained by Lakey et al. (2005) for the MAAS scale replicated those reported by Kernis and Goldman (2005).”
Relationships between Authentic Leadership, Moral Courage, and Ethical and Pro-Social Behaviors (2011, background): “Through establishing such a context, Ilies, Morgeson, and Nahrgang (2005) argued that authentic leaders will promote higher levels of personal agency in their followers (Kahn, 1990; Kernis & Goldman, 2005).”
State Authenticity in Everyday Life (2016, background): “Although the AI predicts well-being-related phenomena (Davis, Hicks, Schlegel, Smith, & Vess, 2015; Kernis & Goldman, 2005), its psychometric properties have not been as thoroughly examined as those of Wood et al.’s (2008) tripartite scale.”
RETRACTED: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors (2010, methodology): “These findings suggest that it may be appropriate to consider the four components as indicators of a higher order latent construct (Kernis, 2003; Kernis & Goldman, 2005).”
Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity (2012, background): “Empirical evidence (e.g., Kernis & Goldman, 2005; Walumbwa et al., 2008, forthcoming) shows that a core AL factor can emerge from the relationships among the four dimensions.”
Development of a Sense of Belonging for Privileged and Minoritized Students: An Emergent Model (2016, methodology): “Authentic people behave in ways that align with their needs, values, and perspectives and do not act “falsely” in order to fit in (Kernis & Goldman, 2005, p. 33).”
Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? ☆ ☆☆ (2013, background): “Empirical and theoretical evidence suggests that a core AL factor can be extracted from the relationships among the four dimensions (Gardner et al., 2005; Kernis & Goldman, 2005; Rego et al., 2012a; Walumbwa et al., 2008).”
: Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust (2011, methodology): “However, there is evidence to suggest that these four dimensions share some conceptual similarities, and that each component focuses on one aspect of authenticity (Kernis & Goldman, 2005).”
The Authentic Personality: A Theoretical and Empirical Conceptualization and the Development of the Authenticity Scale (2008, background): “Although the foregoing discussion has focused on the personcentered conception, the concept of authenticity is considered essential to understanding the human condition in psychodynamic (e.g., Horney, 1951; Winnicott, 1965), existential (e.g., May, 1981; Yalom, 1980), developmental (e.g., Harter et ”
Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure† (2008, background): “Both of these research streams provide impressive empirical evidence of the positive consequences that accrue in terms of physical and psychological well-being to individuals who achieve relatively high levels of authenticity (Deci & Ryan, 2000; Kernis & Goldman, 2005 ).”