Effects of the presence of others on food intake: a normative interpretation.

By C. Herman, Deborah A. Roth, J. Polivy. Psychological bulletin, 2003

735 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0450ce2a5b3faa84605c74242fa1877100763ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A taste of Kandinsky: assessing the influence of the artistic visual presentation of food on the dining experience (2014, background): “These include, amongst other things, the presence of other people [8], the atmosphere or the environment in which the food is consumed [9,10], the cutlery with which we happen to be eating [11,12], and the plateware from which we are eating [13-15].”
Slim by Design: Redirecting the Accidental Drivers of Mindless Overeating (2014, background): “We eat 30–60% more if we eat with others, according to lab studies and food diary studies in free-living conditions (Herman & Polivy, 2005; Herman et al., 2003), and this can increase to as much as 75% when eating with friends or family (de Castro & Brewer, 1992).”
Why did I eat that? Perspectives on food decision making and dietary restraint (2010, background): “In an attempt to reconcile findings that show how social influence may increase consumption with those that increase restraint, Herman, Roth, and Polivy (2003), p. 873) conclude: With only a modest degree of oversimplification, we may conclude that (a) when people eat in groups, they tend to eat…”
Social modeling of eating: a review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice. (2015, positive): “Although broadly understood to be the result of normative influence (Herman et al., 2003b), there is a clear need for research specifically testing the possible mechanisms underlying modeling effects on food intake, and studies that contrast one mechanism against another.”
Modeling of food intake: a meta-analytic review (2015, background): “Furthermore, past theory and research suggests that social models might have an inhibiting effect more than they have an augmenting effect (Herman et al., 2003; Vartanian et al., 2013); we therefore computed the mean effect size separately for low-norm conditions versus no-norm/eat-alone control con”
nUtritioUs or deliCioUs? the eFFeCt oF desCriPtive norm inFormation on Food ChoiCe (2010, background): “to eat more when those around them eat a lot of food and tend to eat less when other people eat less ( Herman, Roth, & Polivy, 2003 ).”
The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution (2009, background): “Work with adults demonstrates that models can influence the quantity consumed ( Herman, Roth, & Polivy, 2003; Salvy, Romero, Paluch, & Epstein, 2007).”
Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption (2010, background): “Some evidence suggests that consumers eat differently with people they know (see Herman et al., 2003).”
Social Context and Advertising Memory (2007, background): “The goal of social desirability is most often manifest in observable behaviors, such as eating (for a review, see Herman, Roth, and Polivy 2003), but also in cognitive activity, for example, when people’s responses remain unobserved and when there is no opportunity for interaction (for a review,…”
Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments (2018, background): “This is particularly the casewhen these injunctions are made verbally by the waiters or the “lunch ladies,”and they create strong affective responses (Herman et al. 2003, McFerran et al. 2010).”