Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments
By R. Cadario, Pierre Chandon. Marketing science (Providence, R.I.), 2018
453 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The effectiveness of healthy eating nudges in field settings increases as they shift from focusing on influencing cognition to affect to behavior.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0c9fb7e145a89e4b18fcc0e233a455c6838ad75
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Clinical Psychology
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- A Review of Nudges: Definitions, Justifications, Effectiveness (2020, unknown): “5 For some examples of nudges promoting health, see Behavioural Insights Team (2016), Lin et al. (2017), Cadario and Chandon (2020), and Gold et al. (2020); for nudges fostering saving for retirement, see Benartzi et al. (2017), Glazebrook et al. (2017), andCronqvist et al. (2018); for nudges…”
- Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare (2020, background): “However, a recent meta-analysis (Cadario and Chandon, 2018) shows that the average effect of “eating nudges” in field settings is small and varies depending on whether nudges are cognitively-oriented or affectively-oriented, for instance.”
- When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects (2019, background): “…a senior research assistant, who are not part of the author team – to rate each default study on the extent to which its design likely triggered each of the three channels (endorsement, ease and endowment; see Cadario & Chandon, 2018, and Jachimowicz, Wihler et al., 2018, for similar approaches).”
- How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies (2019, background): “While neoclassical economics assumes decision-makers to always make rational choices that incorporate all available information, behavioral economics has integrated knowledge from psychology to illustrate the boundaries of rational decision-makers (Camerer and Loewenstein, 2004; Kahneman, 2011).”