Extraverts Have Larger Social Network Layers But Do Not Feel Emotionally Closer to Individuals at Any Layer
By Thomas V. Pollet, Susan C. Roberts, Robin I. M. Dunbar. 2011
204 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bee46e44b62866673fb70f72b70c07f795404894
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Blaine Landis
- Marc H. Anderson
- Andrea Passarella
- Marco Conti
- Jessica L. McCain
- Valerio Arnaboldi
- Ruolian Fang
- W. Keith Campbell
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Blaine Landis
- Marc H. Anderson
- Zhen Zhang
- Robin I. M. Dunbar
- Jason D. Shaw
- Martin Kilduff
- Ruolian Fang
- Gianluca Carnabuci
Citations in the corpus
- The Neurobiology of Social Distance (2020, unknown): “Several fairly conventional factors are responsible for this variation: age (younger people typically have larger social networks than older people [53]), sex (females usually have larger social networks thanmales [53,54], although this does vary with age [55]), personality (extraverts have larger s”
- The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world (2015, background): “Pollet et al. (2011b) examined the offline social network of heavy and casual users of internet social networking sites, and found that they did not differ.”
- Personality and social networks in organizations: A review and future directions (2016, background): “Pollet et al. (2011) found that extraverts had larger networks at every network layer (support, sympathy, and outer).”
- Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? (2016, background): “In offline networks, this variance is due to personality differences (extroverts have larger networks than introverts [55]), gender (women have larger networks than men [56]) and, as we show here, age (electronic supplementary material, tables S3 and S9).”
- Narcissism and Social Media Use: A Meta-Analytic Review (2016, background): “2011070101 Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. K. (2010). How does Facebook browsing affect self-awareness and social well-being: The role of narcissism. Ace, 10, 100–101. Raskin, R., & Ter”
- Female Gamers’ Experience of Online Harassment and Social Support in Online Gaming: A Qualitative Study (2018, unknown): “Initial research assumed that online interactions were not suited to generate offline social support, and potentially impacted negatively on relationships offline (Miyata and Kobayashi 2008; Pollet et al. 2011).”
- The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age (2014, background): “This may be because individuals who are more extraverted generally have more friends (e.g., Demir and Weitekamp 2007; Hills and Argyle 2001; Pollet et al. 2011) and thus additional opportunities to provide support.”
- Integrating Personality and Social Networks: A Meta-Analysis of Personality, Network Position, and Work Outcomes in Organizations (2015, background): “Both self-monitoring and the Big Five traits have received significant theoretical and empirical attention in the network literature (e.g., Klein et al. 2004, Mehra et al. 2001, Oh and Kilduff 2008, Pollet et al. 2011, Sasovova et al. 2010).”