Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions

By Antonio Chirumbolo, S. Livi, L. Mannetti, Antonio Pierro, Arie W. Kruglanski. 2004

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd1c540ae2fee4e80871a11eb55e7bc81a9d365a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. B. Nijstad
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. Christina Anastasopoulou
4. Gerben A. van Kleef
5. C. D. De Dreu

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. B. Nijstad
2. Gerben A. van Kleef
3. C. D. De Dreu
4. D. van Knippenberg
5. Eric Rietzschel
6. Wolfgang Stroebe
7. Carsten K. W. De Dreu
8. Matthijs Baas

In Social Psychology

1. Gerben A. van Kleef
2. B. Nijstad
3. D. van Knippenberg
4. C. D. De Dreu
5. Christina Anastasopoulou
6. Carsten K. W. De Dreu
7. Lukas F. Koning
8. Astrid C. Homan

Citations in the corpus

• Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making (2008, background): “Furthermore, Chirumbolo et al. (2004) found that inducing time pressure leads to lower levels of group creativity (Experiment 1) and that the effect of need for closure on group creativity was mediated by conformity pressure (Experiment 3).”
• Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model (2010, background): “This makes sense in light of the nature of our creative task, for individuals with high epistemic motivation are likely to be more intrinsically motivated to work on an idea-generation task than those with low epistemic motivation (Chirumbolo et al., 2004, 2005).”