Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems (2016, background): “Another limiting factor seems to be the way in which Scottish SMEs obtain their ‘inbound’ sources of innovation (Brown and Mason 2014).”
Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape (2016, background): “Using a panel data for the period of 1995–2000, Ejermo and Källström’s paper contributes to the entrepreneurial universities debate about how academics respond more strongly to R&D resources in supportive environments (Sweden) than in other reference environments (USA).”
Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda (2017, background): “The transition from incubation to acceleration models requires specific knowledge, dynamic markets, and an investor ecosystem; done in isolation, it is likely to end up in the black-box of failed policies (Brown & Mason, 2014).”
A review of literature on open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (2015, background): “A study over UK technology-based SMEs identified that these firms are quite different from policy makers’ perceptions (Brown and Mason 2014).”