The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies

By Dean Xu, Yigang Pan, Paul W. Beamish. 2004

344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb6a5767467f2452d99d694f76901a657303cee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research (2009, unknown): “We estimated our models with STATA 9.1, using the ‘‘cluster’’ sub-command to obtain robust standard errors that are adjusted for the fact that several MNEs had multiple investments in our sample (see Xu, Pan, & Beamish, 2004, for further details of this procedure).”
Offshoring innovation to emerging markets: Organizational control and informal institutional distance (2014, result): “As a preliminary illustration of the utility of our theory, we return to Table 1 and juxtapose our conceptualization of informal institutions against the work of both Gaur et al. (2007) and Xu, Pan, and Beamish (2004) in an attempt to reconcile their results.”
Breaking Through the Cultural Clutter: A Comparative Assessment of Multiple Cultural and Institutional Frameworks (2008, background): “, 2006; Shenkar, 2001), and other researchers have sought alternative measures to capture differences between home and host markets (Drogendijk and Slangen, 2006; Gaur et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2004).”
The Impact of Institutional and Human Resource Distance on International Entry Strategies (2009, background): “The early literature focused on cultural distance, as measured by the Kogut and Singh (1988) index, and recent studies have complemented this with measures of formal institutional (or regulatory) distance (Gaur and Lu, 2007; Xu and Shenkar, 2002; Xu et al., 2004).”
The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, unknown): “Rather, for example regarding institutional distance, studies found a negative effect (e.g. Castellani et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2004) and others found a positive relationship (e.g. Contractor et al. 2014; Schwens et al. 2011).”
Do Foreign Greenfields Outperform Foreign Acquisitions or Vice Versa? An Institutional Perspective (2008, unknown): “Using STATA’s “cluster” subcommand, we adjusted the standard errors of both the first and second-stage models for the fact that several subsidiaries in our sample belonged to the same MNE parent (see Xu et al., 2004 for further details of this procedure).”
Do multinationals really prefer to enter culturally distant countries through greenfields rather than through acquisitions? The role of parent experience and subsidiary autonomy (2007, methodology): “We estimated our models with STATA 9.1, using the “cluster” sub-command to obtain robust (i.e., Huber-White) standard errors that are adjusted for the fact that several MNEs had multiple investments in our sample (see Xu et al., 2004, for further details of this procedure).”
Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs' ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market (2007, result): “This finding is also consistent with the finding relating to H3 and demonstrates that the measure of cultural distance, which has been heavily used by researchers in international business, might be strengthened by measures like linguistic distance (Dow & Karunaratna, 2006), or as suggested by (Xu e”