Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World

By Youngjin Yoo, Richard J. Boland Jr., Kalle J. Lyytinen, Ann Majchrzak. Organ. Sci., 2012

2,373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1dc8883a6b7a6fcf33387d96ab7c605e095eedbf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Satish Nambisan
2. Ola Henfridsson
3. Kalle J. Lyytinen
4. Stefan Seidel
5. J. Holmström
6. Ann Majchrzak
7. Daniel Nylén
8. Shirley Gregor

In Strategy and Management

1. Satish Nambisan
2. Ola Henfridsson
3. Kalle J. Lyytinen
4. Ann Majchrzak
5. Lars Mathiassen
6. Fredrik Svahn
7. Youngjin Yoo
8. J. Holmström

Citations in the corpus

• Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective (2019, background): “This is a consequence of the incorporation of increasingly advanced digital technologies in physical goods, catalyzing the convergence of previously distinct industries (Yoo, Boland, Lyytinen, & Majchrzak, 2012).”
• A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change (2020, background): “Within digital business ecosystems, however, the value propositions pursued can change radically in a short period of time (Yoo et al., 2012).”
• Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation (2017, background): “…why digital innovation processes are particularly difficult to control and predict is the generativity of digital technology (Avital & Te’eni, 2009; Yoo et al., 2012)–—that is, ‘‘a tech-nology’s overall capacity to produce unprompted change, driven by large, varied, and uncoordinated audiences’’…”
• Perspectives on Innovation Processes (2013, background): “These technologies are easily reconfigurable and can fluidly connect heterogeneous actors and artifacts from different domains and cultures (Yoo et al., 2012).”
• Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns (2017, background): “Digital innovation is largely about recombining existing resources and knowledge to spur new ideas (Avital and Te’eni 2009; Tilson et al. 2010; Yoo et al. 2012).”
• The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes (2019, background): “For example, as noted previously, studies have tried to identify the attributes or characteristics of digital technologies, artifacts and infrastructures that promote such generativity (e.g., Bygstad, 2017; Kallinikos et al., 2013; Lyytinen et al., 2017; Tilson et al., 2010; Yoo et al., 2012).”
• Technology Ecosystem Governance (2014, background): “Technology ecosystems must manage the unwieldy challenge of simultaneously realising stability and evolvability through a combination of variance-increasing and variance-decreasing mechanisms (Yoo et al. 2012, Tilson et al. 2010).”
• Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions (2015, background): “Similarly, recent work on digital infrastructure (Tillson et al. 2010) has highlighted the generative nature of digital technologies (Henfridsson and Byzstad 2013), which may facilitate a combinatorial potential for service innovation (Yoo et al. 2012).”